% scoring superior
|
% scoring superior
|
% scoring superior
| |||||
2013
|
2012
|
School
|
Grade
|
Math
|
Writing
|
Science
| |
1
|
1
|
USC
|
11
|
90
|
93
|
98
|
75
|
2
|
2
|
MTL
|
11
|
90
|
94
|
99
|
74
|
% scoring superior
|
% scoring superior
|
% scoring superior
| |||||
2013
|
2012
|
School
|
Grade
|
Math
|
Writing
|
Science
| |
1
|
1
|
8
|
99
|
99
|
98
|
91
| |
2
|
4
|
8
|
94
|
99
|
94
|
90
| |
8
|
10
|
Mellon MS
|
8
|
93
|
95
|
92
|
90
|
% scoring superior
|
% scoring superior
|
% scoring superior
| |||||
2013
|
2012
|
School
|
Grade
|
Math
|
Writing
|
Science
| |
1
|
1
|
7
|
98
|
96
|
NA
|
NA
| |
2
|
5
|
7
|
96
|
97
|
NA
|
NA
| |
7
|
8
|
Mellon MS
|
7
|
95
|
98
|
NA
|
NA
|
% scoring superior
|
% scoring superior
|
% scoring superior
| |||||
2013
|
2012
|
School
|
Grade
|
Math
|
Writing
|
Science
| |
4
|
3
|
Boyce (USC)
|
6
|
96
|
94
|
NA
|
NA
|
5
|
7
|
6
|
95
|
92
|
NA
|
NA
| |
25
|
26
|
Mellon MS
|
6
|
93
|
87
|
NA
|
NA
|
% scoring superior
|
% scoring superior
|
% scoring superior
| |||||
2013
|
2012
|
School
|
Grade
|
Math
|
Writing
|
Science
| |
2
|
3
|
5
|
100
|
97
|
95
|
NA
| |
4
|
4
|
Aiken (KO)
|
5
|
94
|
89
|
97
|
NA
|
5
|
5
|
Howe
|
5
|
93
|
96
|
83
|
NA
|
7
|
16
|
Foster
|
5
|
98
|
93
|
100
|
NA
|
13
|
49
|
5
|
93
|
88
|
91
|
NA
| |
16
|
13
|
5
|
86
|
93
|
89
|
NA
| |
30
|
33
|
5
|
91
|
83
|
88
|
NA
| |
40
|
38
|
5
|
87
|
83
|
82
|
NA
|
% scoring superior
|
% scoring superior
|
% scoring superior
| |||||
2013
|
2012
|
School
|
Grade
|
Math
|
Writing
|
Science
| |
2
|
7
|
Howe
|
4
|
100
|
98
|
100
|
NA
|
6
|
15
|
4
|
99
|
96
|
99
|
NA
| |
9
|
24
|
Foster
|
4
|
100
|
98
|
100
|
NA
|
12
|
49
|
4
|
100
|
97
|
99
|
NA
| |
18
|
26
|
Aiken (KO)
|
4
|
100
|
91
|
100
|
NA
|
29
|
29
|
4
|
95
|
89
|
100
|
NA
| |
35
|
55
|
4
|
95
|
95
|
96
|
NA
| |
44
|
50
|
4
|
95
|
90
|
97
|
NA
|
% scoring superior
|
% scoring superior
|
% scoring superior
| |||||
2013
|
2012
|
School
|
Grade
|
Math
|
Writing
|
Science
| |
1
|
7
|
3
|
98
|
100
|
NA
|
NA
| |
18
|
23
|
Baker (USC)
|
3
|
93
|
93
|
NA
|
NA
|
24
|
34
|
3
|
96
|
90
|
NA
|
NA
| |
32
|
46
|
3
|
98
|
90
|
NA
|
NA
| |
42
|
40
|
Foster
|
3
|
92
|
90
|
NA
|
NA
|
48
|
47
|
3
|
94
|
92
|
NA
|
NA
| |
70
|
42
|
Howe
|
3
|
93
|
95
|
NA
|
NA
|
74
|
109
|
3
|
94
|
97
|
NA
|
NA
|
5 comments:
Is it perfectly acceptable for only positive slants from the District or the Magazine ?
"Acceptable" isn't the word I would use---I would say "expected" because their goal is to make themselves look as good as possible.
In my view, they would gain the public's interest, trust and participation if they would disclose areas of concern. Some great ideas have come from brainstorming.
As always the devil is in the details.
Just a point of interest since the the district and magazine were brought up here.
Both go to great extremes to dictate that people sign their names whenadressing them or submitting comments, but there isn't any problem in Gatto's Need Survey for the SAB of identifying each board member's comments as Person 1, Person 2 and so forth.
What the secrecy, there are only 15 members on the board. Why the secrecy???
Jefferson Middle School should be closed or restaffed. Washington Middle School needs help too.
Jefferson MS?
Elaine
Post a Comment