Showing posts with label missing receipts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label missing receipts. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 11, 2017

Times must be tough on Horsman Drive

This post is a continuation of Getting nowhere quick! from October 2-3.

Another RTK was granted in part and denied in part today. 

On October 4, 2017, the Mt. Lebanon School District (the “District") received your Public Records Request (“Request”), made pursuant to the Right to Know Law ("RTKL"), seeking “receipts for Pursuant Ketchum's invoice for $18,400 (up front expense) and receipts for the first four payments of $14,613.”  
Please be advised that the District has completed its review of your Request and your Request is granted and denied in part.  
The District has located five pages of paper records that are responsive to this Request. Under the Section 701 of the RTKL, the District is not required to create electronic records if the records do not exist in electronic format. Therefore, because these records do not exist in electronic format and because you request that responsive records be sent by email, your Request is denied. Friedman v. Upper Darby School District, AP 2017-0397, 2017 WL 1196380 (OOR March 28, 2017).  
However, the District will scan and email these records upon receipt of payment in the amount of $1.25 (5 pages x $0.25 per page) made payable to the “Mt. Lebanon School District.” Alternatively, the records will be made available for copying at a cost of $0.25 per page. 
Long story short, I went up to the Business Office with my $1.25 only to learn that Jeanine was gone for the day. I hope she will be able to send my request to me tomorrow.

Here is my receipt for $1.25. As I told the ladies in the Business Office, (never saw Jan Klein,) I didn't want to cause a financial hardship to the District. Times must be tough on Horsman Drive if they are expecting to be paid $1.25 up front.

Tuesday, October 3, 2017

Getting nowhere quick!

All I questioned were the missing receipts and if the contract ended early. Never heard back about the missing receipts.

From: egillen476
To: schoolboard 
Subject: Fwd: Second Request 
Date: Mon, Oct 2, 2017 9:06 pm

Just so everyone is aware.

For the Community,

Elaine T. Gillen

-----Original Message-----
From: egillen476 <egillen476@aol.com>
To: mbirks <mbirks@mtlsd.net>
Sent: Mon, Oct 2, 2017 5:33 pm
Subject: Re: Second Request

Again, thanks. So what about the missing receipts for $18,400, $14,613, and $14,613?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mary Birks <mbirks@mtlsd.net>
To: egillen476 <egillen476@aol.com>
Sent: Mon, Oct 2, 2017 5:18 pm
Subject: Re: Second Request

No it was not terminated early. It was a contract for professional services. They paid for the time and services they utilized.

On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:16 PM egillen476@aol.com <egillen476@aol.com> wrote:

Thank you for for your response, Mary. So the contract was terminated early? I am still looking for the up front receipt for $18,400, as well as the two missing receipts for two of the four months that were invoiced for $14,613 per month.

For the Community,

Elaine T. Gillen
-----Original Message-----
From: Mary Birks <mbirks@mtlsd.net>
To: egillen476 <egillen476@aol.com>
Cc: Tim Steinhauer <TSteinhauer@mtlsd.net>; SchoolBoard <schoolboard@mtlsd.net>

Sent: Mon, Oct 2, 2017 5:01 pm
Subject: Re: Second Request

Ms. Gillen,

The contract was for $184,000. We did not use the full amount of the services with Pursuant Ketchum. It was a professional service, and the district paid as the services were rendered.

For the Board,

Mary D. Birks

On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 10:47 AM, egillen476@aol.com <egillen476@aol.com> wrote:

Here's the thing, Mary. The receipts that were provided, came from a RTK. If I request a RTK for missing documents, then I will receive an email five days after I submit it, saying that no such records exist. So now what?

For the Community,

Elaine Gillen



-----Original Message-----
From: Mary Birks <mbirks@mtlsd.net>
To: egillen476 <egillen476@aol.com>
Cc: Tim Steinhauer <TSteinhauer@mtlsd.net>; SchoolBoard <schoolboard@mtlsd.net>
Sent: Mon, Oct 2, 2017 10:24 am
Subject: Re: Second Request

Dear Ms. Gillen,

If you are looking for a public document, please submit your Right to Know request to RTK officer, Jeanine Szalinski, jszalinski@mtlsd.net.

For the Board,

Mary D. Birks


On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 5:29 PM, 'egillen476@aol.com' via SchoolBoard <schoolboardemaillist@mtlsd.net> wrote:

Tim,

Since I no longer hear back from the school board, I am sending this email to you. Were the missing receipts paid from another fund? Was the contract with Pursuant Ketchum terminated?

Elaine Gillen



-----Original Message-----
From: egillen476 <egillen476@aol.com>
To: schoolboard <schoolboard@mtlsd.net>
Sent: Sat, Sep 30, 2017 7:19 pm
Subject: Second Request


Dr. Strotmeyer,

OK, I lied. This is my first request. I was just saving myself the time to send the usual second request email.

I want to thank you, Dr. Strotmeyer, for being so prompt with your last response. Since you seem to be the only responsive school board director, I am addressing this to you.

From my blog:



Retained Counsel Fees Schedule according to PK Consulting Services Agreement totaling $184,000. (Travel and Strategic Creative Services not included.)

Missing receipts totaling $54,931. Were they paid from other funds? Was the contract terminated? Is this another example of award winning Jan Klein's creative financing? Would you be able to answer my questions?

Thanks in advance. 
Elaine Gillen