Saturday, February 26, 2011

FAQ

If there is one good thing that came out of the High School Project fiasco, it created an awareness in local government that hasn't been there in a long time.  Residents are approaching me with questions like, "I have never taken an interest in our local government before this project and don't know the process." "What ward am I in?" Don't be embarrassed.  I didn't either.  I didn't even know who our commissioners and members of the school board were until a few years ago.  Yes, I always voted, but never really knew what ward I was in, just knew enough to go to Foster School to vote.  So for those of you who are like I was, here is a link to Mt. Lebanon's ward map.  To find your ward by street, Mt. Lebanon's website also has this Ward & District Locator.  The only way you can vote for me in the Primary election, is if you are a registered Republican and you live in Ward 3.  If you are a registered Democrat or Independent, you will be able to vote for me in November.  I have additional voter information on my website.  http://www.elainegillenward3.com/Elaine_Gillen_Ward3/Voter_information.html  While you are there, learn how to register to vote, if you haven't registered yet.  
I really should have paid more attention in my ninth grade Civics class!  Who knew?

What happened to us?

I just got my latest issue of mtl Magazine.  Who paid for the high school renovation insert?  Did I read somewhere that mtl is required to print so many School District inserts per year?  Either way, it was our tax dollars "at work."  After looking at the renderings, does anyone believe that the project is over the top? Does anyone believe that it will bankrupt the community?  Did the Municipality cave in to the pressure from the small group supporting the renovation?  Mt. Lebanon, after all, is rewriting the Zoning Ordinance to permit the SOS signs to stay up indefinitely.

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Breaking News

For nearly a year, I have been actively involved in Concerned Citizens of Mt. Lebanon, a watchdog group aimed at monitoring the High School Renovation project and its ramifications in our community. As Lebo Citizens, our focus broadened to include both the School District and the Municipality. During this time, I have attended and recorded numerous School Board and Commission meetings, developed and maintained lebocitizens.com, started a related blog and asked many questions of our elected officials.

All of this work was done on a volunteer basis, but I recently came to the realization that I need to do more. Today, I did just that when I filed to run for the open Ward 3 seat on the Mt. Lebanon Commission. As a longtime resident and a Mt. Lebanon High School graduate, I know this community and will persevere to ensure its survival. 

You have my pledge to work as hard as an elected official, as I have as a volunteer. I hope I can count on your support and your vote.

Focused on our future,
 
Elaine Gillen 
www.elainegillenward3.com

Question: How many lawyers does it take to renovate a high school?

Answer:  Too many.  The latest law firm that is getting involved in the high school renovation is Babst, Calland, Clements and Zomnir.  They will be reviewing Volume 1 of the bid specifications for the high school renovation project at a price not to exceed (ex[c]eed) $3,500.  This third-party review was performed so that the School Board can take action on approving the bid documents on Monday, February 28.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

"Degree of Motivation"

 The following letter to the editor comes from Richard Gideon, publisher/editor of American Vexillumtm magazine - ISSN 1544-5984

Ms. Gillen: 

     A recent article published in Reason magazine sheds some interesting light on the issue of public spending for education.  The US spends more money per student than any other country in the world except Switzerland.  What we get for this money is mediocre science and math test scores, on a national basis.  The student-teacher ratio has fallen and teacher pay has increased dramatically, but compared to countries in the Far East, Scandinavia, and other places in the world, American kids are left in the dust.
     As a former post-secondary teacher (for 23 years), I had to deal with the products of the public schools.  Without exception, it was the "degree of motivation" that was a better indicator of an individual's success than the district from which he or she came (with the exception that kids from private schools, or home-schooled kids, were nearly always in the top of their classes); and this included kids from the "better" districts, such as Mt. Lebanon or Upper St. Clair. 
     In the end, quality education is a mix of teacher skill and viable raw material, not an impressive brick and mortar structure. 
     The Reason article may be viewed on-line here:
http://reason.com/archives/2011/02/22/losing-the-brains-race.

Best Wishes,
Richard R. Gideon

Monday, February 21, 2011

When you can't have closed meetings, schedule conflicting meetings

This was in last week's Trib.   Mt. Lebanon officials won't agree to closed meetings

"It's a gray area, and I err on the side of caution," said Mt. Lebanon Solicitor Philip Weis, who advised the commissioners that the meetings would be better off open to the public.
"We'd rather give (the public) more than give less and be at fault," Miller said.
Posti, who took over as board president in December, said she wanted to schedule the meetings to foster more communication between the school district and the municipality.

Brumfield initially voted with commissioners DeIuliis and D. Raja for the closed meetings as long as they had some method for public review, such as published agendas. But after Weis reviewed the law, Brumfield said he changed his mind.

Saturday, February 19, 2011

Commissioners, thanks for trying to be accomodating (Updated)

Traditionally, the Commission and the School Board would hold their meetings two Mondays a month.  Unfortunately, both would meet on the same evening once a month.  In 2011, our Commissioners moved their meetings to the second Tuesday and the fourth Monday, to avoid conflicting meetings.  Or so we thought.  This month, the School Board is having three Monday meetings, with the reconvened meeting conflicting with the Mt.Lebanon Adjourned Commission meeting scheduled for February 28.  The following email exchange pretty much sets the tone.

Mrs. Gillen,

No.

For the Board,

Josephine Posti
President
Mt. Lebanon School Board
412.667.1479
http://jposti.blogspot.com/

Mission: to provide the best education possible for each and every student



-----Original Message-----
From: egillen476@aol.com [mailto:egillen476@aol.com]
Sent: Sat 2/19/2011 5:10 PM
To: School Board Email list; commission@mtlebanon.org
Cc: Dr. Timothy Steinhauer; sfeller@mtlebanon.org; tkelley@mtlebanon.org
Subject: Reconvened meeting????

Ms. Posti,
I was just posting the agenda for Monday's School Board meeting on lebocitizens.com and noticed that there is a School Board reconvened meeting scheduled on February 28, 2011.  That conflicts with the Commission meeting.  They moved their meetings to Tuesday evenings to avoid conflicts with School Board meetings.  Would you be able to reschedule your reconvened meeting so that it does not conflict with the Commission meeting on February 28?
Elaine Gillen

Updated February 20, 2011 The agenda for tomorrow's meeting is here. Agenda for 2/21/11 meeting How can item 14 announce a reconvened meeting when number 15 on the agenda is Adjournment?  Robert's Rules of Order state when a meeting is adjourned, it is over.  Tomorrow's meeting is very important.  How can they announce a reconvened meeting when in fact, the regular meeting hasn't even occurred (convened)? This sounds unethical to me.

Right here, right now

I got an email from Borders Books this morning, that the sale starts today.  Everything must go.  No, this is not an advertisement for Borders Books.  This is just another indicator that our region is in trouble.  Borders filed for Chapter 11 bankrupcy reorganization on Wednsday.  I was hoping our School Board would have scaled back the high school renovation project.  Money is drying up.  When the bids come in, will we get the project we were promised at the cost listed on this campaign postcard? Vote for Dale, Alan & Dan  They were right.  The November 3rd Election certainly did affect our tax dollars!!

Thursday, February 17, 2011

A delay?? Oh my!!!

We have no owner's rep, no owner's liaison, but we have an attorney to review the bid package??  Oh, come on, folks!!!

The Mt. Lebanon school board wants one more expert to weigh in on its high school renovation project before it goes out to bid, pushing the project back by a week.

Read more: Mt. Lebanon High School renovation proposal delayed - Pittsburgh Tribune-Review http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/pittsburgh/s_723207.html#ixzz1EFvFlBvv

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Are you better off today than you were two years ago?

TWO YEARS AGO VS. TODAY
 


January 2009
TODAY
% chg
Source
Avg. retail price/gallon gas in U.S.
$1.83
$3.104
69.6%
1
Crude oil, European Brent (barrel)
$43.48
$99.02
127.7%
2
Crude oil, West TX Inter. (barrel)
$38.74
$91.38
135.9%
2
Gold: London (per troy oz.)
$853.25
$1,369.50
60.5%
2
Corn, No.2 yellow, Central IL
$3.56
$6.33
78.1%
2
Soybeans, No. 1 yellow, IL
$9.66
$13.75
42.3%
2
Sugar, cane, raw, world, lb. fob
$13.37
$35.39
164.7%
2
Unemployment rate, non-farm, overall
7.6%
9.4%
23.7%
3
Unemployment rate, blacks
12.6%
15.8%
25.4%
3
Number of unemployed
11,616,000
14,485,000
24.7%
3
Number of fed. employees, ex. military (curr = 12/10 prelim)
2,779,000
2,840,000
2.2%
3
Real median household income (2008 v 2009)
$50,112
$49,777
-0.7%
4
Number of food stamp recipients (curr = 10/10)
31,983,716
43,200,878
35.1%
5
Number of unemployment benefit recipients (curr = 12/10)
7,526,598
9,193,838
22.2%
6
Number of long-term unemployed
2,600,000
6,400,000
146.2%
3
Poverty rate, individuals (2008 v 2009)
13.2%
14.3%
8.3%
4
People in poverty in U.S. (2008 v 2009)
39,800,000
43,600,000
9.5%
4
U.S. rank in Economic Freedom World Rankings
5
9
n/a
10
Present Situation Index (curr = 12/10)
29.9
23.5
-21.4%
11
Failed banks (curr = 2010 + 2011 to date)
140
164
17.1%
12
U.S. dollar versus Japanese yen exchange rate
89.76
82.03
-8.6%
2
U.S. money supply, M1, in billions (curr = 12/10 prelim)
1,575.1
1,865.7
18.4%
13
U.S. money supply, M2, in billions (curr = 12/10 prelim)
8,310.9
8,852.3
6.5%
13
National debt, in trillions
$10.627
$14.052
32.2%
14

In the last two years we have accumulated national debt at a rate more than 27 times as fast as during the rest of our entire nation's history.  Over 27 times as fast! 
Metaphorically, speaking, if you are driving in the right lane doing 65 MPH and a car rockets past you in the left lane 27 times faster . . . it would be doing 1,755 MPH! 
This is a disaster!
Sources:
(1) U.S. Energy Information Administration; (2) Wall Street Journal; (3) Bureau of Labor Statistics; (4) Census Bureau; (5) USDA; (6) U.S. Dept. of Labor; (7) FHFA; (8) Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller; (9) RealtyTrac; (10) Heritage Foundation and WSJ; (11) The Conference Board; (12) FDIC; (13) Federal Reserve; (14) U.S. Treasury

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

So Long, $5,100,000

Letter to the Editor:

Today, February 15, 2011, the School Board is paying $700,000 to holders of the High School Bonds.
So, why pay bondholders today? The bonds were issued too early and the School Board promised to pay today.
Wait, it gets worse! An additional $4,400,000 of tax-free interest is being paid to bondholders too.
Superintendent Allison used to say, “Do the math!”
 $700,000 + $4,400,000 equals $5,100,000 of squandered money because the bond was issued on October 21, 2009.
The next time you see a School Board Member, an Administrator, or a Finance Team Member thank them for saying:
“So long $5,100,000.”
That is enough money to buy 25 houses for $200,000 each.
John Ewing

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Eligible for a free lunch?

It looks like there are more students eligible for a free or reduced-priced lunch that ever before in Mt. Lebanon, according to today's Trib.  


Eligibility for the free and reduced-price lunch program is tied directly to income levels. Students from a family of four are eligible for free lunches if their family's annual income is $29,055 or less; students from a family of four with a family income up to $40,900 are eligible for reduced-price lunches. 


In the Mt. Lebanon School District, eligibility rose from 6.1 [in 2006] to 8.8 percent [in 2010].  
If there are any eligible Lebo Citizens readers with kids in high school, make sure to talk with your child's guidance counselor.  SAT fees and many college application fees can be waived. If only the School Board and Commission majority would have taken off their Rose-colored glasses before approving the high school project.  

Read more: 
More students in Western Pennsylvania qualify for free, reduced-cost lunch - Pittsburgh Tribune-Review http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/pittsburgh/s_722661.html#ixzz1DtoS2sS3

Friday, February 11, 2011

Laugh of the Day

Mt. Lebanon School District has published their draft of the Bullying Policy on the District website for Monday's meeting, February 14, 2011.
  Bullying Policy


Background
The Mt. Lebanon School District’s goal is to establish a secure school climate, conducive to teaching and student learning that is free from threat, harassment, and any type of bullying behavior. One of the District's core values calls for each member of our learning community to demonstrate respect toward others.

Bullying includes, but is not limited to, physical intimidation or assault; extortion; oral or written threats; malicious teasing, putdowns, social isolation or name calling; threatening looks, gestures, or actions; cruel rumors; and false accusations, including any of the foregoing via electronic communications such as the internet, email, text messaging, or other methods. 
Mt. Lebanon School District has published their draft of their Unlawful Harassment Policy on the District website for Monday's meeting, February 14, 2011.
  Unlawful Harassment Policy


The District also condemns and prohibits any retaliatory behavior against any complainants, witnesses or persons who participate in the investigation of a report or complaint of harassment.


So why is this the Laugh of the Day?   Read my previous posts about the SOS signs and our School Board Directors.  Granted, waking up to an SOS sign outside my window was not on school property, but this is leading by example?  What?  You say it could be kids?  Just yesterday, I posted that there were no SOS signs on my street.  I complained about the signs on Wednesday.  Why wasn't it kids when complaints were filed in the Fall due to missing VOICE signs, if that even happened?  Why were adults suspected of removing the signs then, but now, it could just be kids?

The VOICE website has this as their headline:
The High School Renovation Project Is Finally a Done Deal!

If it is a done deal, then why are we still being bullied and harassed?

Dear Mt. Lebanon government

Lance: To Mt. Lebanon government. The board of commissioners this week gave final approval to a zoning change that paves the way for a more than $113 million high school renovation project. The project already has resulted in a 10 percent-plus increase in school taxes with more on the way. What will the school board and commissioners do when there's no more money to underwrite their follies?

Read more: Laurels & Lances - Pittsburgh Tribune-Review http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/s_722305.html#ixzz1DfSghXG4

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Sick of the SOS signs?





Here is the email that I sent to the Commissioners and School Board today.  I thought it would be interesting to share Josephine Posti's reply to my email.  


Mrs. Gillen,
While neither the District nor the municipality produced the signs, they're a form of expression similar to flying a flag, displaying a Steelers sign or writing a blog. You may want to check in with the folks who produced the signs to gain a better understanding of their intent.  While you may feel "the signs have no more pu(r)pose," I'm certain they'd be happy to talk to you about it.

Whether you decide to reach out to those affiliated with the group who produced the signs or reach out to a neighbor whose sign you consider an eyesore, I do hope that you take the opportunity to reach out, share your concerns constructively, listen to their point of view and engage in active dialogue.  Last night's vote was the result of years' worth of hard work by many people in Mt. Lebanon. Some have supported the project; some haven't but each, including you, played a role.  Regardless of where each of us stand on that spectrum we are all neighbors who share a very special community with a bright future.

For the Board,

Josephine Posti
President
Mt. Lebanon School Board
412.667.1479
http://jposti.blogspot.com

Mission: to provide the best education possible for each and every student



-----Original Message-----
From: 
egillen476@aol.com [mailto:egillen476@aol.com]
Sent: Wed 2/9/2011 5:45 PM
To: School Board Email list; Dr. Timothy Steinhauer
Cc: 
commission@mtlebanon.orgsfeller@mtlebanon.orgtkelley@mtlebanon.org
Subject: VOICE website

Josephine Posti and Dan Miller,

As Ed Kubit told me back in October, since the signs are considered "political" in nature, they could stay up after the Planning Board meeting.  In their own words, "the High School Project is Finally a Done Deal."  The signs have no more pupose.  Last night, I asked Mrs. Rose if the signs could come down and her response was,  "Maybe they will, or maybe they won't."  What a fine attitude by our School Board Director.  The signs are an eye sore.  How much longer do we need to look at them?  At what point can the Municipality start citing these homes?

Elaine Gillen

From the VOICE website:
The High School Renovation Project Is Finally a Done Deal!
On Tuesday, February 8, the Mt. Lebanon Commission voted 3-2 in favor of final approval of the high school project.  Commissioners Matt Kluck and Dan Miller were the dissenting votes after their motion to table the vote failed.  The Commission voted unanimously on the conditional use to renovate and rebuild the school, the shared parking agreement and the development agreement.  The project should go out to bid in 30 days, and the hope is to break ground in May.  Thank you for your support to see this project through the approval phase!  Click on the button below to email your thanks to the Commission.


Their sign campaign was originally for the Planning Board meeting.  Here is the post from their site:

Yard Sign Campaign, Ceiling Collapse, Critical Planning Board Meeting <
http://voiceofmtlebanon.org/content/yard-sign-campaign-ceiling-collapse-critical-planning-board-meeting>
Posted Wed, 09/22/2010 - 15:56 by Nancy Tashman
To All Supporters of the High School Renovation,
As you know, the Mt. Lebanon High School project is facing several hurdles in the coming months and opposition to the project is strong and far-reaching. To show our unified support, we are asking all supporters to place yard signs on their property: Save Our Schools, with a picture of a shovel and 
www.voiceofmtlebanon.org <http://voiceofmtlebanon.org/> . We believe a strong show of support will send a message to other residents that the Mt. Lebanon community is behind a quality education and building for our children.
Here's how you can help. Pick up a sign in one of two locations, 73 Roycroft Avenue (off Mt. Lebanon Blvd. near Foster School) and 450 Summit in Sunset Hills. Signs will be on the front porches between 5:00 PM Friday and 5:00 PM Sunday. Please sign your name on the clipboard and report how many you are taking. PLEASE PLANT ALL SIGNS ON MONDAY MORNING, SEPTEMBER 27th. (We need to get signs out prior to the planning board meeting scheduled for Tuesday night.) Also please ask your friends and neighbors to take a sign and spread the word. Another idea is to decorate your sign or yard with blue and gold ribbons to show support for the renovation and generate a buzz in the community.  We are still accepting donations for signs--there will be an envelope with the sign out sheet.....

Are you kidding me?

Too bad Raja waited until after his vote last night to announce his plans.  Do your damage and run!

Mt. Lebanon commissioner to enter race for county exec

D. Raja, a businessman and Mt. Lebanon commissioner, is poised to enter the Republican race for Allegheny County executive.
Mr. Raja, who could not immediately be reached for comment, has called a variety of senior county Republicans to alert them to his interest.
According to an associate, he plans to make a formal announcement some time next week.
The news of Mr. Raja's plans for the race circulated as Patti Weaver, an architect of the Pittsburgh Tea Party movement, was about to formally launch her bid for the Republican nomination at a rally today at the City-County Building.
"My only comment, is, let the best person win," Ms. Weaver said of the news of Mr. Raja's prospective candidacy.
County Councilmen Matt Drozd and Chuck McCullough have also said that they are considering bids for the GOP nomination, but neither has announced a final decision.
Mr. Raja's decision sets the stage for contested races on both sides of the primary ballot for executive. County Controller Mark Flaherty and county Council President Rich Fitzgerald have announced their candidacies for the Democratic nomination to succeed Dan Onorato, who chose not to run for a third term.

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11040/1124153-455.stm

Where are the 95% CD Estimates?

Now that the Municipality has cleared the way for the bidding process to begin, the Question of the Day is,"Where are the 95% CD Estimates?"

In a previous post, Let's play the Lebo Shell Game, the link to the 90% Construction Document Estimates is provided.

Is this part of the Lebo Shell Game?  How can this go out to bid without the 95% Construction Document Estimates?  Where is the transparency?

Repeat after me: "It's going to be great for our community."

Repeat after me:  "It's going to be great for our community."

That was Dr. Steinhauer’s great thought after last night’s meeting.  It didn’t matter that they had to lie, fool with the numbers, raise our taxes astronomically, focus on construction and litigation rather than education, and ignore what the majority of citizens of Mt. Lebanon wanted.  I looked around in that meeting room that holds eighty people and saw the smiling faces of the proponents of the High School renovation.  I thought to myself, "These are the people who wanted it.  They’re all in this small room."  

Repeat after me:  "It's going to be great for our community."

I went downtown yesterday and paid my county taxes.  I had to wait for the man in front of me to remove his shoes before going through the metal detector.  That gave me time to take off my coat and place it and my purse on the belt.  I felt sorry for him.  The County taxes are the “easy” ones to pay. 

Repeat after me:  "It's going to be great for our community."

Dan Miller was trying to cap the amount of parking spaces in the Discussion session.  His point was that you can’t put ten pounds of potatoes in a five pound bag.  It didn’t matter if they were Russets or sweet potatoes (or students or faculty.)  It was a basic concept, which couldn’t be grasped by Raja, Dave, or Joe.

Repeat after me:  "It's going to be great for our community."

Matt Kluck quoted “The Mt.Lebanon Comprehensive Plan” which can be found at http://pa-mtlebanon.civicplus.com/DocumentView.aspx?DID=13 . He reminded his peers of the community development objectives that were identified as the vision for the Comprehensive Plan as printed on page 1-3.   This Plan also identifies “Rising school taxes” as the number two threat to Mt. Lebanon.

Repeat after me:  "It's going to be great for our community."

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

The good news is...

The Commissioners have decided NOT to participate in the Joint Steering Committee meetings with the School Board until they are open to the public.  Bravo!!!

No surprises

As expected, Joe, Raja, and Dave voted to grant final approval for the Mt. Lebanon High School Additions and Renovations Land Development Plan. Dan and Matt voted against it.  Bottom line, after all the voting, it is a go. 
After the meeting was over, I asked Sue Rose if the SOS signs can come down now.  Her answer?  "Maybe they will.  Maybe they won't." 

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Inconsistencies and Contradictions

The following are inconsistencies and contradictions associated with off-street parking in the submitted Plans/Requests for Conditional Use Approval vs. testimony in the January 24, 2011 public hearings.  I hope the Commission has taken notice of what is in the record.  Links to the podcast are below.



1.         The District, in the Wilber Smith Parking Analysis and in public hearing testimony by Mr. Rhodes of Wilber Smith represented that there are 904 junior and senior high school students age 16 1/2 and over. Applying the Zoning Ordinance requirement in § 817.5 of 0.25 times the 904 number equates to 226 qualifying students (assuming they are licensed). The Mt. Lebanon Zoning Officer, Planner, Engineer, Traffic Engineer and Planning Board have agreed with this calculation and 226 figure.

2.         Within the Wilber Smith Parking Analysis is a Parking Management Plan (PMP). This PMP is an integral part of the overall District plans and has been accepted by the District without objection (see attachment). The PMP indicated the District will allocate only 203 off street parking spaces out of 542 spaces to students.

3.         However, in testimony during the public Hearing on January 24, 2011, and therefore in the record, the high school Principal, Dr. Ron Davis, responding to a Commission question as to how many student parking passes had actually been issued, testified that there had been 285 student parking passes issued as of the middle of December, 2010, and “typically we cut off at 315”.

4.         How does the District explain the 285 actual and 315 cut off vs. PMP of 203?

5.         The District’s 285  “actual” figure was then disputed by testimony and documentation presented and submitted by resident Cindy Murphy. Mrs. Murphy, in seeking a student parking pass for her son, quoted the District high school staff employee authorized and responsible for issuing student parking passes that this year 306 student parking spaces had been issued against a limit of 315!

6.         These discrepancies, in testimony and record indicate reported actual student parking pass issuances exceed the Zoning requirements by between 59-80 spaces, and the official PMP by from 82-103 spaces, depending upon whether either 285 or 306 “actual” passes have been issued. How can this be satisfactorily explained?

7.         Proceeding further, the District claims in the Wilber Smith Parking Analysis and in Asst. District Facility Manager Mr. Rick Marciniak’s Hearing testimony, that there are 241 individual District employees based at the high school. However, resident Mrs. Paula Bongiorno testified and provided District documentation that the District reported having 282 employees based at the high school in PlanCon Form E (March, 2010); and, in the District 2009 CAFR 294 employees were reported as being based at the high school. How can such contradictions be explained or tolerated?

8.         Taking even the lower District figure of 241 employees, and adding them to the reported student pass issuances, reported above, of 285 and 306 results in parking space demand of 526 to 547 off-street spaces vs. the PMP total available supply of 542 spaces.

9.         While some may consider this to be “acceptable for horseshoes” it begs the fact that the figures in item 8 immediately above do not include PMP parking space requirements for:
·        Visitors –                    32 spaces
·        Handicapped –          19 spaces
·        Police –                         1 space    
  52 spaces

In other words, the PMP is profoundly flawed and actual student parking pass issuances grossly exceed the Zoning Ordinance calculation and District assertions. This notice also provides doubt as to the adequacy of off-street and shared parking spaces to meet actual and planned demand and needs.

These matters should be resolved prior to any overall and final Commission project approvals.


Links to the January 24, 2011 Public Hearing:


Conflict of Interest???

In today's Post Gazette, there was a brief with the Ward 3 Commissioner's picture.  Apparently he has a new job.  Here is the link. http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11037/1123343-318.stm#ixzz1DBrXSPdl
Chuck Chrissis was hired by dck worldwide as vice president of business development; Joe DeIuliis was hired as business development manager, Pittsburgh region.
Dck Worldwide LLC, the former Dick Corp., the Pittsburgh region's largest construction company, has sold its construction management unit to Hill International Inc., for an undisclosed price.
"Dck has served as construction manager of some of the best known and largest construction projects in the region, including the new Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, PNC Firstside Center, Pittsburgh International Airport, and the Homestead Grays Bridge."

I Heart Dan Miller

(and thanks to Matt Kluck and Dave Brumfield too)

School Board: Take a lesson!

From Dan Miller's blog:

Latest on School Board Project

Daniel Miller February 6th, 2011
Obviously many in town are interested in the outcome of the two Public Hearings that were before the Commission last meeting regarding the High School project.
The Solicitor has rendered his draft opinion and the general substance of that is now available for review on our website in the form of our posted agenda for the February 8th meeting.
Of note is that the Solicitor advised that the review of his draft opinion could qualify for executive session- meaning that the it could be conducted behind closed doors and out of public view. However like all topics that could be in executive session, that “privilege” can also be waived- meaning that if three Commissioners wanted to they could move that private review into the public discussion session.
Given the extraordinary interest from the public I am very pleased to announce that the 2nd and 4th Ward Commissioners voted with me to have that discussion in public (a 3-0 vote).
Therefore, on February 8th we will have what amounts to be a special discussion to review the Solicitors draft starting at 6:15pm. As always the public is invited to attend and observe that meeting.

http://danmillerward5.com/latest-on-school-board-project

Thursday, February 3, 2011

Sunshine Week March 13-19

I know the perfect way to celebrate Sunshine Week 2011.  How about opening the Joint Steering Committee Meetings to the public?  For those of you who are not familiar with the Joint Steering Committee, two members of the Commission (usually the president and the vice-president) meet with two members of the School Board (usually the president and the vice-president.)  This year, President Miller and Commissioner Kluck wanted to hold these meetings with the public present, and three Commissioners didn't care either way.  The School Board, with their usual issues about transparency, have encouraged a second year of private sessions with the Commission.  Last year, a resident was turned away.

Note: Dan Miller did not attend as Vice-President last year and will not attend as President of the Commission this year.  Thanks, Dan!!!!

Here is a little video about our rights. 


For more information about Sunshine Week, go to sunshineweek.org

Update 02.04.11 On page 10 of the PA Department of Community and Economic Development publication, "Open Meetings The Sunshine Act,"
In that same document, under "Recording Devices," it clearly states on page 11 that the Sunshine Act allows persons attending public meetings to record the proceedings with recording devices including videotaping equipment.  Persons who attend and verbally participate in public meetings must expect to have their statements recorded. (Harman v. Wetzel, 766 F.Supp. 271, E.D. Pa.,1991) Ms. Posti, this should be good news to you, since you don't have to remind the residents that they are being audio recorded even though the meetings are also televised.

So when is the next Joint Steering Committee meeting?  There are a couple of us who would like to attend.

T-R-A-N-S-P-A-R-E-N-C-Y part 2

This appeared in this week's Almanac.  Peters Township holds annual joint steering committee meetings that are ALWAYS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC!!!  Ahem.  Do I need to repeat that, members of the School Board and Commission?  WHAT ARE YOU HIDING?

Feeding from same trough
Twelve Peters Township elected officials sat down at a U-shaped table Jan. 31 and talked. That's all they did - talk. No one yelled. No accusations were hurled across the room. No threats or "what's in it for me" were uttered. They just talked and, more importantly, they listened to each other. How refreshing for politicians to do such a thing.
Each year, usually at the end of January, members of the Peters Township Council and Peters Township School Board hold a joint meeting, alternating locations each year. This year council hosted the event in the municipal building. Cookies and pots of fresh, hot coffee were available. The meeting was extremely civil, yet casual. School board members sat next to council members. There was no assigned seating and the conversation flowed easily. Occasionally, there was a slight hint of laughter.
The meeting is always open to the public, but, unfortunately, few, if anyone, ever attends other than those who are supposed to be there. At the most recent gathering, there was only one township resident in the audience and nowhere on the agenda is there a listing for public comment.
No votes are taken even though all seven council members attended. No reasons were given as to why four of the nine school board members were absent, but the district's superintendent, assistant superintendent and business manager were there, as were the assistant township manager, township planning director and parks and recreation director. Neither group's solicitor attended. No lawyers were there, with the exception of two attorneys who are elected officials - Frank Arcuri on council and David Hvzidos on school board.
Even though the school district's administration offices and the township offices are almost across from one another along East McMurray Road, communication is not necessarily a constant. The annual meeting is a fantastic chance for everyone to come together to discuss upcoming traffic projects that will affect school bus routes, to learn the number of new building permits for residential houses that may impact future school enrollments, and to learn more about what plans the school district has to help the two entities share athletic facilities.
The only hint of discord came at the end of the 90-minute gathering when the township asked the school district to help in the cost of installing a planned warning track at the township-owned baseball field. The township may own and maintain the facility, but the school district is the main user. The discussion never became heated, just not as amicable as the previous topics. Both groups decided to solicit financial quotes in order to determine how much the total cost may be.
How civil.
Perhaps the purpose of the meeting was summed up by Council Chairman Robert Atkison who said that while both groups had different agendas, diverse needs and varying future projects, "We all (feed) from the same trough."
How true.
And wouldn't it be nice if the rest of the country's politicians could take note of the civility expressed in Peters Township, and understand that they, too, feed from the same taxpayers' "trough."
http://www.thealmanac.net/ALM/Story/02-02-2011-editorial

Updated 10:29 a.m. Oh wait!  There is more!!! On the PT blog, https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9071530993756028699&postID=5902649752791057377, it seems that sports is ruining that community too.  One reader writes, "It is not about the common good for all citizens, children and community anymore. It is nothing but arrogance, greed, entitlement and self satisfaction."  Does this sound familiar, Mt. Lebanon?  The president of the township council is also the president of the football boosters.  I apologize. Things are bad in Peters too, they're just more transparent about it.