Friday, April 29, 2011

Still Comparing Apples to Oranges?

While Blogger tries to fix their problems, I found this article about Upper St. Clair's budget gap.  http://upperstclair.patch.com/articles/upper-st-clair-school-district-narrows-budget-gap Dale Ostergaard brought up these same issues at the April 25 meeting.  James Fraasch had warned us. In the article, Upper St. Clair said they don't have much latitude.  We do.  We have been given a second chance.  That is how many see it here in Mt. Lebanon.  If the School Board candidates are out campaigning, as they should be, they should know that already.

On Lebo Citizens The Facts, this entry is posted. 
On May 6, 2010, Mt. Lebanon School Board Director Elaine Cappucci and high school renovation architect, Thomas Celli, made a joint presentation on “21st Century School Design Promoting Entrepreneurial Education” at the Pennsylvania School Board Association School Design and Construction Conference in Lancaster, PA.
Note: “The presentation was not one that was approved or even reviewed by the Board.” 
                                                               -School Board Director James Fraasch, Blog Lebo

Unfortunately, the presentation has been removed from the PSBA website.  Mrs. Cappucci has been quoted as saying that she will not revisit Building C.  I hope that has changed. Maybe that could be "Plan B" as is written on her campaign website. http://voteccl.com/news If Plan B doesn't work, try Plan C[AC].

Update: A reader shared a copy of the presentation: 21st Century
Update 8:46 am Slide 2 shows the Taj Mahal.  How appropriate.  Slide 10 shows Blogger.  Interesting timing since Blogger went down yesterday and this morning.

Thursday, April 28, 2011

The Way Forward

The following letter, written by resident Steve Diaz, was sent to the School Board Directors on Apr 28, 2011 8:34 am.  It is being reprinted with Mr. Diaz' permission.

Members of the School Board:  In the midst of the din and disappointment over the bids received on "the new high school", it was a pleasure to see the board finally upset with its advisors, particularly Architect Celli, over the failure to accurately comprehend the likely range of project bids.  Most significant, to me, was the board president's cry that Mr. Celli's undisclosed list of 75 candidate reductions "should have been presented to the board a year ago."  Indeed they should.  But many suggestions from the CAC and others on such points were received by a stone ear, as the board was not really interested in such cuts.  One example arises in the LEEDS certification matter. This is a policy value of high significance in the community in Mt. Lebanon, one that was an essential element of the advocacy for the project (see your own brochure, written, printed and mailed to us at our own expense).  Now, Mr. Remely says that LEEDS certification is an easy take away--really?  The underlying issue with the effort to reform the bloated proposal that went out for bids (a rebuild, not a "renovation" project, if we are honest with ourselves) is that the credibility of the board is directly in issue. You seem to have lost your soul by suddenly now demanding answers to questions that you failed to address when the community, including a petition signed by 4,000 voters, asked you to do so. Question the LEEDS standards and the true returns for the cost?  That was deemed unreasonable and unacceptable by the board back during the Act 34 public hearings.  What else might be cut? The third gym? Mr. Remely went shouting after a Municipal Planning meeting that it was a mandatory element of the project to satisfy community demands.  The extra over-sized addition to the new pool?  Notwithstanding substantially decreasing student population trends, that has also been ridiculed as an absurd and miserly approach--the pool was even defended at the risk of not telling the truth when, contrary to published board policy, our superintendent told the Municipal Commission that parking was not in issue because the facility would definitely not be open to the public. Not tear down the newest building on campus?  This was also openly mocked when suggested to the board by the public on many occasions.  Given such items, what do you expect to see on Mr. Celli's obscure list of "75" reductions that might, at this time, have become acceptable (remember, you told the public that the project was as tight as it could be, with no fluff--again, see your own minutes, tapes of meetings, and your boastful brochure)?

The result of such behavior, your own unprompted but closely observed conduct and words, is that you seem to have slight regard for facts, and no actual plan or value other than spending as much money as you can without obtaining review from the voters. With such a decision process, no wonder you find yourselves confused and in disarray.  But on you push.  As Mr. Rothschild has insightfully observed, you cannot push on without completely re-scoping and re-conceiving the nature and the purpose of a "renovation."  It is time to show a modicum of humility and admit that the process has been badly mismanaged for a long time.  Admit that you have not listened to the people.  Admit that you may not be the right decision makers. Has it occurred to any of you who were so invested in the absolute correctness of the proposal that at this juncture you have had your turn at the wheel and perhaps it is time for you to voluntarily step down and allow new leadership to clean up and lead us forward?  Has it been worth all the damage and rift in this community you have caused by your intransigence, disrespect for public opinion and single-minded refusal to compromise, only to come to this juncture?  

It seems to me that a public apology is due from all of you to Mr. Fraasch for the manner in which you treated him.  It seems to me that a clear sign of new-found respect for the petition of 4,000 of your neighbors and constituents is also in order.  It also seems to me that any self-respecting board member with a sense of shame should be willing, publicly and voluntarily, to accept personal responsibility for what you and your policies have done.  Don't look to blame others, chosen by you in the first instance, for your own failures in formulating and achieving successful public policy.  Show true leadership and some measure of maturity---you have not succeeded, don't keep doing that which has not worked for any of us.  

Respectfully.  Steve Diaz

They push...and push...and push

In today's paper, Matt Santoni from the Trib, writes:

Board member Dan Remely recommended further changes to the project as it moves forward, like relaxing the district's pursuit of "green" certification for the building, or fighting the municipality's decision to designate the building as a "high-rise" based on its height from the proposed new entrance on Horsman Drive.
Mt. Lebanon Fire Chief Nicholas Sohyda said the designation has been part of the fire code since 1970, when it was amended to say that any building higher than 50 feet would be considered a high-rise.
The code for such buildings includes requirements like smoke-evacuation systems, pressurized stairwells, communications systems, water pumps for the sprinkler system and a small "fire command" room with alarm panels and connections to the intercom system.
Municipal Commission President Dan Miller, himself a volunteer firefighter, said any conversation about relaxing the building's fire code standards was "a non-starter."
"I've pulled a dead child from a fire. ... I'm sure as hell not going to let them skimp on public safety just to save a million bucks," Miller said. "I tried to save them money on the inspection fees, but I'm not going to let them skimp on that."
As I recall, Dan Remely said that the "high rise" designation cost the District a million dollars. If we eliminate the million dollar bridge, aren't we back to even?  Oh wait, that's right.  The bridge is there to keep the kids safe when crossing Horsman Drive.  Here's an idea. Eliminate the bridge and when hiring a crossing guard for the student parking at the church, hire a second crossing guard for Horsman.  I wonder what the ROI would be for that decision.

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/pittsburgh/s_734251.html

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Are deduct alternates a bad idea?

From Construction Administration for Architects by Greg Winkler, Gary C. Chiumento
Chapter 4, page 104
http://tinyurl.com/3dsorud

According to this article, architects should not resort to this when bids come back too high.

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Now is the time

As the School Board Directors stated, now is the time to step back, review, and reduce or delete some of our desires.  (Comments from Dan Remely and Dale Ostergaard from Part 2 of 4.25.11 meeting) How big will that second bond be?  The world has drastically changed since 2008.  What are we really able to afford?  Energy savings or a Leed Certificate?
John Taormina, construction manager from P.J. Dick, was asked to compare the Upper St. Clair renovation cost differential to our project.  He said that it would be comparing apples to oranges.  We offer programs that are not offered at USC.  For instance, we have two theaters, they don't. We have several gymnasiums which USC does not have.  We offer dance class.  USC does not.  As a member of the CAC whispered to me last night, maybe that is why USC is always number one in education.
It was mentioned that our project was allowed to grow from a bush into a tree and now we have to cut off limbs.  Do you think it had anything to do with the special interest groups exclaiming that we can get so much more for only $18 a month more?  The VOICE website is on the SOS signs and clearly promotes this way of thinking, to this day.  Last night, the Commission passed the sign ordinance revision for the SOS signs, in the name of freedom of speech.  This group mislead the School Board.  They mislead the community.  They were also silent at last night's meeting.
For a moment in time last night, the entire community agreed that the project needs to be scaled back.

Sunday, April 24, 2011

Eblast that arrived in my mailbox

Dear Family, Friends and Neighbors,

I have it on good authority that in view of this week’s newspaper reports, now is a more critical time than ever to encourage residents to do the following:

1. Contact the Mt. Lebanon School Board requesting that they either put the project up for a community vote or go back to the drawing board and develop a plan according to the original bond issue - and not one dollar more.
If you would like to reach the solicitor and all board members via a single email address, please address your email to schoolboard@mtlsd.net.

Mrs. Josephine Posti (2013)
President
jposti@mtlsd.net

Mr. Dale Ostergaard (2013)
Vice-President
dostergaard@mtlsd.net

Mrs. Mary Birks (2013)
mbirks@mtlsd.net

Mrs. Elaine Cappucci (2011)
ecappucci@mtlsd.net




Mr. Edward Kubit (2011)
ekubit@mtlsd.net

Mr. Lawrence Lebowitz (2011)
llebowitz@mtlsd.net

Mr. Daniel Remely (2013)
dremely@mtlsd.net

Mrs. Susan Rose (2011)
srose@mtlsd.net

Ms. Faith Ann Stipanovich (2011)
fstipanovich@mtlsd.net


2. Contact the Commissioners and ask them to put pressure on the school board to put the project up for a community vote or go back to the drawing board and develop a plan according to the original bond issue - and not one dollar more. 

Raja Ward 1 Commissioner raja@mtlebanon.org
Matt Kluck Ward 2 Commissioner mkluck@mtlebanon.org
Joe DeIuliis Ward 3 Commissioner jdeiuliis@mtlebanon.org
Dave Brumfield Ward 4 Commissioner dbrumfield@mtlebanon.org
Dan Miller Ward 5 Commissioner dmiller@mtlebanon.org

3. People should also be encouraged to post on blogs to this effect.

Letting our elected officials know your position/opinion and keeping this in the public eye is very important right now.  Please consider going to the school board and commissioner meeting, and speak up. 

The next meetings are:

April 25, 2011
Mt. Lebanon Commission Discussion Session 6:30 p.m., Commission Chambers, Mt. Lebanon Municipal Building

Mt. Lebanon Adjourned Commission Meeting 8 p.m., Commission Chambers, Mt. Lebanon Municipal Building

Reconvened Mt. Lebanon School Board Regular Meeting, 7:30 p.m., Mt. Lebanon High School Library 

Friday, April 22, 2011

John Allison's Parting Gift for Mt. Lebanon

A blog reader took the June 8, 2009 School Board Meeting podcast that I posted in a previous thread and cropped out the portion of John Allison's 9:42 minute address to the School Board and community.  (Thanks goes out to the person who sent this to me.)
I do hope the current School Board takes 9:42 minutes out of their holiday weekend and listens to Mr. Allison's words.  Here is the link. John Allison's Address.

Actually, it is my hope that everyone who reads this blog, takes the time to listen to this.  If the School Board listened almost two years ago, we wouldn't be in the mess we are in now. 

Thank you, John Allison for your sage advice.  Maybe they will listen this time.

Update 4.23.11 I have gotten a couple of emails saying that their computer won't allow them to download John Allison's address.   His message can also be heard in June 8 2009 Meeting Part 2 or email me at EGillen476@aol.com and I will email you the clip.

Timely letter to the editor

Just as our federal and state governments are making cuts to needed medical and educational programs, our local school boards have to make budget cuts also. The only problem is that they complain about those cuts but haven't learned a lesson themselves.
Cutting math, science, language and music programs seem to be less important than athletics. Where are their priorities? The percentage of students who will be able to make a living in the sports world is so miniscule that to preserve high school athletics in a tight budget crisis is inexcusable in these times of belt tightening. If some sort of athletic activity (football, basketball, baseball) is thought to be so important, then let those who participate raise the funds needed. These are activities that are extra curricular with the accent on extra.
The majority of students benefit from classes that prepare them for real life not the dreams of becoming a superstar in the world of sports, where the percentage of becoming a professional is lower than the percentage of finding today's honest politician. It's a sad day for our communities and school districts when academics have to take a back seat to appease those who can't make the right choice when it is right in front of them.
Remember, these are the future leaders who will be making choices for you when you are in need of elder care. They'll probably toss you a football and tell you to go out and exercise. Oh, by the way, you want fries with that.
LOU WEBER
West Mifflin


http://blogs.sites.post-gazette.com/index.php/opinion/open-letters/26788-school-boards-are-making-the-wrong-cuts

Thursday, April 21, 2011

The Way We Are

The following letter, written by resident Steve Diaz, was sent to the School Board Directors on Apr 21, 2011 9:49 am.  It is being reprinted with Mr. Diaz' permission.


Members of the School Board:  It is now clear that after years of bobbing and weaving, the efforts of the Mt. Lebanon School Board to avoid a vote of the people on the appropriate scope and purpose of renovations to the High School have come to naught.  There is no reason for us to be at this juncture, but here we are, so, "quo vadis"?

One response could be to continue to plot and plan to avoid engaging the entire community in the decision process in a meaningful way.  That approach has so far produced nothing more than unreasonably deferred maintenance (including roofs allowed to go to leaking causing interior damage, neglect of desirable upgrades such as new seats for the auditorium or wiring upgrades, or the relatively modest alterations required to come into full compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act).  You could choose to avoid facing the fact that your methods have sometimes reflected more enthusiasm for your own views than respect for facts---such as when you allowed and then remained silent after representations were made by our superintendent to the town commission that the proposed swimming pool would not be open to the public (when that came into issue because of parking requirements) even though your official and published policy is that the pool is to be open to the public; or, when 4,000 voters petitioned you to reconsider the economics of what you are doing, and you ignored this historic public outcry; or, when you gamed the open hearing process by never evaluating, responding to, or even tabulating the Act 34 submissions that were supposed to be your guide as to public sentiment on the project; etc., etc.  It is for you to choose if you will continue a most undesirable polarizing policy that has created a public rift that threatens the social fabric of our community for years to come.

Another response would be to take responsibility for not heeding other voices or considering seriously enough whether your aspirations might exceed the fiscal reach of this community.  A small, "maybe we could have been more careful and listened a little harder" would go a long way to restoring your credibility and effectiveness as a public, purportedly "representative", body.  This is an opportunity to circle back and bring the community together, rather than to feed on the division which has largely been occasioned by the stone wall tactics you have employed in recent years.  You sit in the chairs of privilege, it is up to you to initiate reconciliation or to choose another policy. Everyone wants the best education for the children of Mt. Lebanon, most support our outstanding athletic and creative and performing arts programs.  Nonetheless, creating a false crisis by negligently allowing our assets to waste for want of maintenance and routine upgrading shows disrespect for those very educational and enrichment programs that have been entrusted to your stewardship -- it does not bootstrap you into overblown expenditures no one can afford (not raising taxes just before the election does not fool anyone into thinking that the coming increases are not as "unacceptable" as the bids you have just received on your project).

Therefore, as a citizen and taxpayer, and father of students in the high school, I call upon you to live within our means, to do your public duty by addressing the legitimate maintenance, wiring, ADA and related issues, and use the already borrowed funds to care for our common school property.  Stop wasting time and money chasing dreams that are unlikely to lead to success for anyone.  Mistakes have been made, please do not compound them by papering them over or denying that change is urgently needed in the management of our school affairs.  I urge you to usher in a new age of cooperation and communication with your constituents, starting with an admission of past shortcomings and a rededication to our common goal of superior education in this community.  It is time for you to take another look at the path you have followed toward your goal and, with the benefit of hindsight, make a mid-course correction that will reflect thoughtful policy making and dedicated stewardship of the public trust.  It is Easter-time: a small mea culpa is in order.  The bids you have received create the perfect opportunity to engage in a cy pres exercise of realism and open mindedness.  I hope you will take the high road forward--should you choose to do so, many of us in opposition may, to your surprise, join you on that path.

Respectfully,

Steve Diaz

What went wrong?

"I was very upset to hear about this, and I'm working diligently with others to correct the situation," said board member Dan Remely on Wednesday. "We're meeting with administrators this afternoon to see what we can change or what might have went wrong. ... Was it the wrong directions, wrong instructions, or wrong (specifications)?"
What went wrong?  I could say so much, but I will ask you folks to answer that.  Maybe the School Board will listen to us this time.

Update 10:47 AM At the June 8, 2009 School Board Discussion Meeting Part 1 and Part 2, there was a discussion about Add Alternates.  It was pointed out that $11 million in athletic improvements was suggested, $7 million went towards green technology, $1 million was added for budget oversights, but not one dollar was added for academic issues.  Before the Add Alternates, we were at the $110 million mark.  Listen to John Allison say that we cannot afford this after Sue Rose had asked for his input.

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Groundbreaking Ceremony Postponed

From the Mt. Lebanon School District website:

The High School groundbreaking ceremony scheduled for April 28, 2011 is postponed while the Board deliberates on the outcome of the bids for the High School project.  http://www.mtlsd.org/district/

I hope the School Board considers rescheduling the reconvened meeting that conflicts with the Commission meeting on April 25, 2011.  The Commission will be holding a public hearing to amend the Mt. Lebanon Code regarding signs, such as the Save Our School signs.  Bill No. 6-11 http://www.mtlebanon.org/archives/30/APPROVED%20Supplemental%20agenda%2004-12-11.pdf

Update 5:57 PM The Post Gazette now says that the bids came in $15.3 million or 16.5% over cost estimates. More numbers have been released.  Read them here: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11110/1140565-100.stm

Celebrate Fiscal Responsibility Day

Here is an idea for the School Board, for what it's worth.  Change the April 28, 2011 Groundbreaking Ceremony to "Celebrate Fiscal Responsibility Day."  Show the community that we are all in this together.  We're not fear mongers, hijackers, anti kids, obstructionists, anti sports, or naysayers as we have been called in the past year.  We want what is best for the community too.  Let this be a wake up call and turn this into an opportunity to unite the community.  Come up with a good plan and let's get the high school renovated at a cost that is more in line with our economic situation. We can't say that we didn't see this coming.  I still have the link to the August 9, 2010 presentation on lebocitizens.com.  http://www.mtlsd.org/highschoolrenovation/stuff/presentationarchitectaug2010.pdf  This would be a good start.

No $75 Million Plan, and No $113.3 Million Plan Either

There is no additional $18 a month.  It would be much more.  Sounds like a referendum is in order.
http://www.pittsburghpostgazette.com/pg/11110/1140565-100.stm#ixzz1K3aSJNBk

Update 8:30 AM 
Additional links: http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/pittsburgh/s_733105.html
                        VOICE flyer handed out at Foster School 5-4-10
                        Letter from Dirk Taylor
                        Writer defends former engineer
                        DAD Team promise
                        Lebo Citizens Keeping a Tally

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Student Parking License Agreement

At Monday's School Board meeting, the Board approved the Parking License Agreement with Mt. Lebanon United Lutheran Church in substantially the form presented, subject to final approval by Dr. Steinhauer and the Solicitor. In this agreement, Mt. Lebanon United Lutheran Church will provide 127 parking spaces for $1500 per year.  The School District must remove the snow from the lot, including Sundays.  In addition, the School District will hire a crossing guard for the students.  The School District will repave and restripe the lot at the end of the construction project. 

Is this something the Municipality needs to be approving, as well?  The District gets its salt and fuel from the Municipality stockpile off Cedar Blvd. Crossing guards report to the Police Department, which I think, the Municipality funds 50%.

Update 10:09 PM  It has been confirmed by Manager Steve Feller that crossing guards are funded 50% by the Municipality.  He also said that there is no requirement of guards to cross high school students or adults, only elementary and middle school students.

Monday, April 18, 2011

Any volunteers?

Another 4:30 p.m. Policy Committee Meeting has been scheduled for May 3, 2011.  Are there any volunteers who would be willing to record the meeting?  I can provide the recorder.  The last 4:30 meeting meant someone had to leave work early to record it.  Why does the School District schedule meetings at this time?