Bethel spends $3.1 million of their capital funds on technology

Upgrades to Bethel Park’s school computers to cost $3.1 million

Feb 21, 2018 12:36 pm
Bethel Park School District is projected to spend roughly $3.1 million over the next five years to keep its technology up-to-date.​

Another potential teachers' grievance in our future?

The Trib reported yesterday in Social media policy scrapped by Bethel Park School Board:

The Bethel Park School Board rescinded a nearly 2-year-old social media policy for staff and volunteers this week after the teachers' union agreed to withdraw an unfair labor charge it filed with the state Labor Relations Board, officials said. 

Asserting that the policy with rules for using cell phones, Facebook, Twitter and blogs was overly broad, the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania last year also told district officials it was prepared to take legal action against the district. 

Bethel Park school directors voted 5-0 Tuesday to scrap the policy; four members were absent. Board members couldn't be reached for comment Wednesday. 

“Under the advisement of our solicitors, we rescinded it to give us some time to review it,” district Superintendent Nancy Aloi Rose said.

Here in Mt. Lebanon, our school board directors adopted a similar policy, Policy GBEE Student Communications on October 17, 2011. I wonder how the Bethel Park Teachers' Union would rate our policy.

Speaking of MTLSD policies, I love the spelling of "Exercises" listed on Policy IKF here.

USC, Bethel, but not here UPDATED

A Lebo Citizens reader was kind enough to send me the following message from the Bethel Park School Board President, Donna Cook. http://www.bpsd.org/boardmessage.aspx

The take-away that I got from President Cook's message:

• All Bethel Park Administrators voluntarily took a wage freeze for the 2011-2012 school year.
• The  school board appreciates their constituents' attendance and participation in these meetings;  it has become increasingly difficult to sit silently while statements are being made that are simply not correct.

All BP's administrators voluntarily took a wage freeze for 2011-2012.  Upper St. Clair's top administrators took voluntary wage freezes. All of our school administrators got sizable increases. We have parents complaining about the math program. One parent's comments from Monday's meeting about our math program are spot on. Monday's presentation was illustrating a state wide comparison. Interestingly enough, the regional comparison is disappointing. Here is a page from the presentation comparing math SAT scores. We're ranked 18, while Upper St. Clair is ranked #8, North Allegheny 10, and Fox Chapel is ranked at 14. Dr. Deb Allen said that we must not rest on our laurels. I don't think we have "laurels to rest on." Our science scores are marginal.  While our super Super is blogging about Chinese proverbs and is "transfixed" while doing photo essays on the view outside of his window, our school board directors continue to spend money like there is no tomorrow.  If the Mayans are right, maybe there will be no tomorrow, but in the meantime, how about putting a cork in it, Josephine? Stop wasting our money.

The second point is for my commissioner's benefit.

Update November 23, 2012 2:45 PM Witte comment about MTLSD math program
Also available here:
Witte comment on Lebocitizens.com

After our Taj Mahal is completed...

Will our teachers be in the same position as the Bethel Park teachers? Yes, we can keep raising taxes to pay for the high school sports complex and someday fix those windows, but when their contract is up, will we have any money to pay the teachers? Bethel Park will have a nice, new high school, but if the teachers aren't happy, then what good is it? Now that the Commissioners want to take out a recreation bond, our municipal taxes will be going up.  Substantially.
I am reprinting Allegheny Institute for Public Policy Brief Volume 11, Number 40.

Pennsylvania Becomes a Teacher Strike Dinosaur

(August 2, 2011)--The Commonwealth endured three teacher strikes this past school year, with Allegheny County serving as the epicenter of activity.  Walkouts in the Allegheny Valley, Moon, and Bethel Park School Districts inconvenienced students and families and continued the trajectory of Pennsylvania seeing a teacher strike somewhere in the state every year since the 1976-77 school year. News concerning the state of affairs in the Bethel Park School District brings the issue of teacher strikes back into focus. After enduring a six week strike last year, the Bethel Park schools are once again facing a possible teacher walkout after the board and the teachers’ union rejected an arbitration proposal. Why? Because teachers want more money and continued control over work rules. If Bethel Park teachers are the first to walk off the job in the 2011-12 school year, they will be doing it in quite a different environment, at least at the national level.  As we have pointed out many times, Pennsylvania is in a very small group of states that permit teachers to strike.  This past spring Ohio and Wisconsin passed legislation that diminished the size of that fraternity by eliminating the dreadful practice.  Both states reported no strikes by teachers in the school year just concluded. Too bad Pennsylvania is so late to the teacher strike elimination derby. Pennsylvania stands with Vermont as the only state in the Northeast as allowing strikes. None of its neighboring states allow strikes. So why is it that Pennsylvania’s legislators cannot get this albatross off the backs of children and taxpayers? Two bills—one that would amend the Constitution to prohibit strikes and one that would impose penalties for striking—have been in committee since June.  Another bill that would have allowed layoffs to occur because of economic reasons (adding that to enrollment decline, cessation of a program, or school consolidation as permissible reasons for layoffs) is similarly languishing in committee. It is hard to imagine a situation more insulting to management and taxpayers. Not only are teachers permitted to be strike, but they cannot be laid off when school districts face economic and financial hardships. Taxpayers must still cough up more money. Only when a district eliminates a program can a teacher be dismissed. Pennsylvania should assist Bethel Park and other districts facing a strike by quickly passing a law containing the provisions of Wisconsin’s Act 10 passed earlier this year. Indeed, under the Wisconsin statute, not only would they be forbidden from striking, they would not be allowed to bargain for anything other than base wages. Benefits, work rules, etc., would be left to management to decide upon. Moreover, the school district would not be permitted to withhold union dues from employees and remit them to the union bosses. And finally, the union would have to hold a recertification vote every year with a requirement that 51 percent of all bargaining unit members vote in the affirmative for the union to continue as the representative of the employees. Or Pennsylvania could look to Ohio.  That state’s changes to their collective bargaining law prohibits strikes by public employees, including teachers, and imposes penalties of two days’ pay for every one day out on a strike.  It also restricts bargaining to wages and some working conditions, but not pensions, health care, or sick time.  There is to be a statewide referendum in November to determine whether or not that law will continue to have force. Bethel Park would certainly benefit from a dose of Wisconsin’s or Ohio’s treatment of union abuse of taxpayers and the public. Justifications for permitting teacher strikes ring very hollow and reflect no values or principles that actually promote education quality or efficient and effective delivery of education to Pennsylvania’s students.  Jake Haulk, Ph.D., President Eric Montarti, Senior Policy Analyst   For more on this topic click here Link to Allegheny Institute Website