Showing posts with label Lebo Shell Game. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lebo Shell Game. Show all posts

Friday, April 12, 2013

Where the H is H?

On Monday's school board agenda, the board will approve a resolution urging increased State funding for school construction and renovation projects in the form presented.

The PG reports:

Meanwhile, the board plans to approve a resolution next week as a formal objection to not receiving state reimbursement for a portion of the ongoing high school renovation project.

Participation in a long-standing process called Planning and Construction Workbook, or PlanCon, entitles school districts to be compensated for embarking on capital improvement projects.

According to Mr. Steinhauer, Mt. Lebanon is owed about $450,000 per year, eventually totaling $11 million, but the state budget has not provided for any reimbursements to school districts the past two years. Some 125 districts are being affected, and many have drafted similar resolutions.

The documents are being sent to the offices of Gov. Tom Corbett and Education Secretary Ron Tomalis, as well as to state senators and representatives. Many of them are unaware of the lack of reimbursements, Director Mary Birks said.

"We are bringing it to their attention so that they know what the issue is," she said.
How can the State reimburse Mt. Lebanon when we're behind in filing the proper documents for the PlanCon process? Part H (PDF), Project Financing addresses the financing used for a project. Calculation of the temporary reimbursable percent for a project's financing occurs at PlanCon Part H. Once PlanCon Part H is approved, reimbursement on a project commences.  Have we done this?

The High School Renovation Process (saved in Google Docs) illustrates how behind the board is in the process. It shows that PlanCon Part F was the last submission approved. However, the February 20, 2012 agenda indicates "That the Board approves submission of PlanCon Part H to the Pennsylvania Department of Education in substantially the form presented."  This is the last item I can find pertaining to PlanCon Part H.  Was it ever approved by the PDE? Did the board approve it after that - approve the approval? 

I have been told that even after PlanCon H is submitted, approved by the state,
and the state's approval is accepted by the District, that an application for state subsidy must be submitted for each scheduled payment.  Has that been done?

Reimbursement is not reflected in the budget. Once approved, the budget cannot be reopened, unlike the Municipality.  Just as the Covenant tax money was never shown in a budget, this PlanCon money will disappear as well. How could the State provide reimbursement in the past two years when the paperwork was allegedly submitted last February?

The Lebo Shell Game lives on. As a reader commented previously,
"Jan Klein has and will continue to plug the state reimbursement hole with our tax dollars to balance the budget - read that extra millage - and that extra millage will not be reduced when the state payments are finally paid !"

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

"Splain it to me, Lucy."

More and more people are asking the same question that David Huston has presented to Jan Klein, so I thought I should post it here.   Maybe someone can come forward and explain Jan Klein's math.  I have been told that it has to do with gaming revenue, but we can't figure out how she accounts for it.  As Ricky Ricardo used to say, "Splain it to me, Lucy."

Budget forecast

From: wq3t@hotmail.com
To: jklein@mtlsd.net
CC: tsteinhauer@mtlsd.net
Subject: RE: forecast millage question
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 02:43:50 +0000


Ms. Klein,
  I showed the formulas on the sheet and pointed to the answers. I have attached the same sheet to this message for your review.

Here they are again:
Audited 2009-2010
Real Estate Tax 48,362,461 divided by Assessed Valuation 2,154,641,502 equals 2.24% or 22.4 mills.
Millage rate 24.11 minus previous answer 22.4 mills equals 1.71 mills.
How do you account for the difference of 1.71 mills?

Budgeted 2010-2011
Real Estate Tax 53,570,408 divided by Assessed Valuation 2,170,447,511 equals 2.47% or 24.7 mills.
Millage rate 26.63 minus previous answer 24.7 mills equals 1.93 mills.
How do you account for the difference of 1.93 mills?

Final Budget 2011-2012
Real Estate Tax 53,806,797 divided by Assessed Valuation 2,173,384,611 equals 2.48% or 24.8 mills.
Millage rate 26.63 minus previous answer 24.8 mills equals 1.83 mills.
How do you account for the difference of 1.83 mills?
Let me know if you have any questions.
David Huston

From: JKlein@mtlsd.net
To: wq3t@hotmail.com
CC: TSteinhauer@mtlsd.net
Subject: FW: forecast millage question
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 15:28:19 +0000

Mr. Huston,

I am not sure what your calculations are, so I can’t respond accurately to your question.

Respectfully,

Jan Klein

Jan Klein
Director of Business
Mt. Lebanon School District
7 Horsman Drive
Pittsburgh, PA  15228
412-344-2098

I prefer the errors of enthusiasm to the indifference of wisdom - Anatole France

From: David Huston [mailto:wq3t@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 1:58 PM
To: Jan Klein
Subject: forecast millage question

Ms. Klein,
  See attached pdf with question for you.
David Huston

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Where are the 95% CD Estimates?

Now that the Municipality has cleared the way for the bidding process to begin, the Question of the Day is,"Where are the 95% CD Estimates?"

In a previous post, Let's play the Lebo Shell Game, the link to the 90% Construction Document Estimates is provided.

Is this part of the Lebo Shell Game?  How can this go out to bid without the 95% Construction Document Estimates?  Where is the transparency?