A reader submitted this for consideration. It appears that Jan Klein's numbers are not adding up.
Look at the
Estimated value of Community Assessment in 2013 chart which was dated 8-May-13.
Assessed Value Per Tax Office (5/3/13): $ 2 ,715,449,015
The next line is interesting.
Less Historical % of Liens at Year End est at 1.6%: 43,447,184
Every year, this shows up in the budget. However, it never shows up as revenue when the liens are satisfied. They get paid eventually. Classic example is the $2.3 million windfall for the Covenant. Liens are deducted in the budget which cause the millage to go up. We pay for the liens through our taxes and then when the District collects the liens, we never get a refund or see it budgeted.
Back to the chart. See the 22.61 mills in the orange box? That is our new millage for 2013-2014. But Jan Klein skipped a step. The Anti Windfall Law requires that she first needed to establish the revenue neutral tax rate. That number is 21.17 mills. How do you get the 21.17 millage? Take $54,914,220 (Budget- Real Estate Taxes at 2012-13 Millage Rate) and divide it by $2,593,675
,608 (Adjusted Assessed Value) in the green box. That is the true millage neutral rate. Jan's number is 6.8% over the revenue neutral tax rate, or a 1.44 mill increase.
Doing the Lebo math:
22.61 (Jan's millage)
-21.17 (millage neutral)
1.44 mill increase or 6.8% over the revenue neutral tax rate
Let's look at the "20%" reduction in millage. (Blue Box)
27.13 mills (2012-2013)
-22.61 mills (2013-2014)
4.52 mills
That is a 16.66052340582381% reduction, not 20% reduction!
Percentage calculator
I think there is some explaining to do, School Board. It ain't adding up.