Tuesday, May 1, 2012

A closer look at fields

AGREEMENT FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT ATHLETIC FIELDS

CONSIDERATION OF A JOINT MAINTENANCE

Mr. Brumfield said that on May 1, 1999, the School District, Municipality and Youth Sports Alliance entered into the first agreement to improve the quality of athletic fields owned by the School District. The joint agreement has been very successful, and all of the parties want the partnership to continue.
This new successor agreement has the following major provisions:
  1. Term of two years beginning July 1, 2010 and ending June 30, 2012.
  2. The financial arrangements are the same as contained in the previous agreement. The School District pays Mt. Lebanon $83,300 per year for both infield renovation work and maintenance of the turf grass athletic fields. The Youth Sports Alliance contributes $30,000 each year to the School District for the services.
  3. School District employees are responsible for weekly infield dragging, irrigation and facility maintenance. The School District is also responsible for all lawn mowing.
http://www.mtlebanon.org/archives/31/Approved%20Commission%20Minutes%205-10-10.pdf 

Podcast of May 10, 2010 Commission meeting Part 1
Podcast of May 10, 2010 Commission meeting Part 2


This does not include the artificial turf in the high school stadium. So let's talk about what this means. YSA is paying nothing for municipal fields. The School District is paying $83,300 per year for thirteen fields. That comes to $6407 per field (confirmed with municipal data), which does not include the cost of the District employees cutting the grass, weekly infield dragging, irrigation and facility maintenance which is another $4000 (est.) which comes to roughly $10,000 per field or $130,000 for School District fields. Using the same math for the five municipal fields, it is costing us roughly $180,000 for fields in Mt. Lebanon. According to the agreement, YSA is to be contributing $30,000 a year for School District fields only. It cannot be documented that they have been making this contribution.

Let's recap. We have McNeilly Field which we still owe all the money. We have YSA putting pressure on a commissioner, I mean, passionate to turf and light Mellon Field for $1 million, without any research done for the real costs. YSA is contributing nothing towards municipal fields. And the School District cannot confirm the $30,000 contribution from YSA. Oh my.

YSA 990 2008 Line 28 shows $3597 contributed towards agreement
YSA 990 2009 Line 28 shows $30,000 contributed towards agreement
YSA 990 2010 Line 28 shows $10,000 contributed towards agreement

Update May 2, 2012 9:15 AM
November 16, 2009 Board Summary Agreement voted unanimously by the School Board

Recreational sports groups in Mt. Lebanon had planned to donate money to help build community athletic fields on a parcel off McNeilly Road, but now they've learned just how much one municipal commissioner wants them to donate: $850,000.
David Humphreys at Monday's commission meeting told representatives from the Youth Sports Alliance and other sports groups that since the project cost is approaching $2.5 million, he wants the groups to pony up $850,000.
That would be half of the $1.7 million cost to do basic improvements to the 23-acre parcel.
Bruce Fisher, of the Youth Sports Alliance, and Art McAuley, of the Mt. Lebanon Soccer Foundation, said the alliance has just received the proper tax status to raise money. McAuley said his group could pledge $125,000 but couldn't commit to the full $850,000 now.
The groups are working with a fund-raising consultant and hope to have a plan soon.
http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/local/neighborhoods-south/townsouth-route-19-briefs-578029/


 In the July/August 2008 Mt. Lebanon Magazine, http://ebooks.mtlebanon.org/mtl/mtl-112008/pageflip.html page 9 Dave Donnellan said:
Field options being considered It’s never been easy scheduling youth sports on Mt. Lebanon’s limited number of fields. But in recent years, with enrollment in recreational and club sports on the rise and weather as unpredictable as ever, the problem is getting worse. In 2003, more than 500 kids played soc- cer through the Mt. Lebanon Recreation Department. That number has steadily grown, and this year topped out at a whop- ping 1,201 for the spring and fall programs. That doesn’t even count the kids who play for the Mt. Lebanon Soccer Association, a private soccer group. Likewise, recreational T-ball grew from 70 kids in 2003 to 155 this summer.“Each spring and fall the youth sports as- sociations, the Youth Sports Alliance, the school district and the recreation department meet to determine the scheduled use of the fields in Mt. Lebanon. It is always a struggle to try to accommodate the needs of all the users,” says David Donnellan, Mt. Lebanon’s recreation director. “New fields and/or fields with artificial turf and lighting would help, not only to accommodate the growth in youth sports, but also would allow for taking fields out of service periodically so that they can recover and be properly maintained.”But what’s the best way to do that? In 2003, Mt. Lebanon municipality purchased 23 acres off McNeilly Road for $1.8 million in the hopes of turning it into ath- letic fields. Commissioners have held public meetings to gauge interest, but they have not continued on page 10 town topics Fast-tracking the revitalization of Mt. Lebanon’s commercial districts, and in particular the “Uptown” central business district, is the mission of Mt. Lebanon’s Economic Development Council (EDC) Task Force. Led by Commissioner Raja, the task force rep- resents various groups that have a stake in Uptown’s future. For the past several months, the task force has been meeting simultaneously with the EDC in public session at the municipal building at 7:30 a.m. on the last Friday of every month. There is a lot of brainstorming, as is typical when a group of energetic, creative people convenes. Some ideas are huge undertakings that could come to fruition in the long run; some may be pipe dreams. But other ideas have actually become plans that can be ac- complished over the short term. Here is an overview of things that have taken place or are in the works. continued page 8 More than 760 kids, preschool through second grade, signed up for soccer programs through the Mt. Lebanon Recreation Department this fall. The fields get heavy use and parking is often insufficient. Commissioners are looking at several proposals that would either increase the number of fields or extend the amount of time they can be used by installing artificial turf and lights. 




Update 9:29 AM

In Posti's own words, http://jposti.blogspot.com/2008_11_01_archive.html
Then: "both parties sharing the cost" Now: Municipality only
Then: "whether a $1 million cost is justifiable" Now: It's justifiable if the municipality pays all costs
Then: "concerned about the environmental impact of artificial turf" Now: Turf away!
Then: Posti wanted an overview of conditions and maintenance costs Now: Who cares?

Read the text cut from the webpage via above URL link:
During Mr. Silhol's Joint Steering Committee report tonight, he described a meeting he, Mr. Allison and Ms. Stipanovich recently had with two commissioners and Mr. Feller to discuss the option that would include installing artificial turf at Mellon as well as Wildcat. This option is obviously one that would need to be considered jointly between the Municipality and the District with both parties sharing the cost.

This evening was the first time we discussed whether we as a board are interested in exploring this option. Some of the concerns I and other board members voiced included the fact that we've recently completed work on Mellon Field to improve drainage as well as whether a $1 million cost is justifiable in light of the high school project and our current economic situation. One of my biggest concerns with this project is that while the Municipality has done their own analysis of their existing fields, undeveloped land and District-owned properties that can be better utilized, we as a District have not yet done an analysis of our own field priorities. In order to understand where installation of turf on Mellon fits into the District's priorities, I would like to see an overview of all of the District's field conditions and what the short and long-term maintenance conditions may be. This is an issue that I raised last month when we approved an unscheduled capital expenditure for Jefferson Field. Mrs. Cappucci also requested a breakdown of how the fields are used - scholastic vs. recreation vs, club sports on each field.

Another concern I shared was the environmental impact of installing artificial turf on these fields - something I believe we're obligated to consider. With our joint participation with the Municipality in the Cool Cities initiative, we do need to give joint consideration to environmental issues that impact the community.

I'm looking forward to learning more about how this project being considered by the Municipality fits into the District's priorities. I do believe that both bodies value the importance of youth sports in our community and I think that there are those among us who would like to find funds to enhance and improve our available options but we also need to address and prioritize the needs within each of our individual taxing bodies while working jointly to find solutions that make sense to a constituency that we both share.

Update 9:37 AM  Happy Birthday, Josephine. Thank you for praying for me.

Update 3:59 PM MLSA 2008 990
                           MLSA 2009 990
                           MLSA 2010 990

Update 4:51 PM 2010 Mt. Lebanon Demographics from US Census

Update 5:01 PM MLLA 2008 990
                           MLLA 2009 990
                           MLLA 2010 990

Update 5:52 PM MLBA 2007 990
                           MLBA 2008 990
                           MLBA 2009 990 
                           MLBA 2010 not on file

39 comments:

Anonymous said...

There are all sorts and kinds of relevant facts in public records that some folks that should know claim they don't know. How strange ! Is it short term memory loss, or "convenient memory", or is it really something else ?

Bill Lewis

Anonymous said...

WHAMM! ---- OOOOFF! ---- KAPOW!

Batman

Anonymous said...

Apparently Mr. Ewing had them pegged. Sophie Smith

Lebo Citizens said...

But it is better to use facts to prove the point. It is more fun too.
Elaine

Anonymous said...

The Agreement is up for renewal again this month , perhaps at the Commission meeting on Tuesday, May 8th. Maybe all the Town Hall folks will be there to explain a few things ?

Bill Lewis

Anonymous said...

And soooooo.... what happens now?
The quid pro quo has been discovered, but nothing will happen.
The YSA backed the HS project proponents and now the YSA is looking for theirs.
What happens now.... nothing!
It's just another day.
Giffen Good

Anonymous said...

And now more facts that no one seems to know about, but have been in the public domain for 8-9 months. Anyone remember the 2012-2016 Muni Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), page 54 ? The turfing & lighting of both Wildcat and Middle Fields was suggested for 2016 at a cost of $1,033,090 to be funded entirely by a bond issue...no public donations. Where did the cost estimate come from ? Who supplied it based on what specs and sources ?

Further, the narrative on p. 54 included "In addition, similar improvements could be done at Mellon Field by the School District for an estimated cost of $1,120,640." What was this source and bases of trhis information ? Very precise figures....

Now, we don't have a clue !

Bill Lewis

Richard Gideon said...

I would like to have it explained to me how YSA can commit to $30,000 a year for District field maintenance when their IRS 990EZ forms for the years indicated on this Blog show they don't have the aggregate cash flow to sustain that level of giving? (Doing it one time "does not an explanation make.")

Lebo Citizens said...

Bill, here is the link to the CIP. I was on a hospital gurney with my iPad approving comments. Now that I am home, I can share the link. Capital Improvement Program 2012-2016. Yep, there it is on page 54.
Elaine

Lebo Citizens said...

Richard, the Soccer Association promised $125,000. There was a "lie" in the Master Design Team meeting minutes for a promise of $8 million. The YSA pledged a $30,000 annual contribution. I guess that is why John Ewing was calling them NSF athletic supporters.

It is all falling into place for me. That is why I did not get any responses for the information we were collecting. That is why it is not going to be presented to the school board. As Bill Lewis pointed out, the facts are out there. They were just hoping we wouldn't find them. Thanks to all who sent me the documentation.
Elaine

Lebo Citizens said...

Don't miss the 3:59 PM update. I posted the MLSA 990's for 2008, 2009, and 2010.
Elaine

Lebo Citizens said...

The 5:01 update shows Mt. Lebanon Lacrosse's 990's.
Elaine

Lebo Citizens said...

Update 5:52 PM Mt. Lebanon Baseball Association 990's
Elaine

Anonymous said...

What's falling into place?

The fact that the sports group have promised but never delivered?

Or the fact that the municipality just doesn't have the money to spend on turf?

I don't mind that the sports groups want what they want. That's politics and happens at all levels of government.

What bothers me is that many of their arguments strike me as hollow. As the documents here and elsewhere point out, the municipality has not once, but TWICE (or more), stuck their wallets out for more field space. This is why we have McNeilly. But each time the sports groups pull the Lucy/Charlie Brown with the football thing and put their wallets back in their pocket at just the wrong time.

Let's get back to an actual solution that makes sense, folks. How about investing some money into existing fields to make them better? How about investing money into existing parks so we don't look like those parks come "Straight out of Compton" (excuse the song reference but it seemed like it worked there!).

Wait, I think I know a commissioner that has that plan on the table. Yes, yes there is! But its the same commissioner that some of the sports people decide to attack.

Here's what I don't get. You have a person willing to invest in fields but the sports groups are saying that we shouldn't invest in fields unless we invest in turf. So the commission apparently is not to spend any money on fields unless its turf? How ridiculous is that? Given their rigidness, perhaps they are simply content with waiting another four years to see if they get a more sympathetic commission. Good luck with that!

Albert Brenneman

Biggus Mouthicus said...

You and those pesky "facts", Elaine. Hateful.
In addition to the smoke blown by the "gimme gimme" crowd in terms of the money they don't have, how about the BS regarding all the alleged care paid to the fields? As a dog owner, I've been offended for years by the sports first people. It's not because I dislike sports, either. What I dislike is hypocrisy. Dogs don't smoke, drink Gatorade, wear jock straps or shoes, carry backpacks, chew tobacco, do math homework or light fires. At least, most dogs don't. I have come across all of that and more immediately following sports practices or games on our lovely and pristine municipal fields. And that's without lights or turf. Look, the koids who live here already think there is a fleet of fairies in the world that will do everything for them. Where did they learn it? That's right, from the entitlement-minded parents and selfish spenders-of-other-peoples-money.
I say, the agreement is inwriting. So what everyone should be asking at the next commission meeting is when can we expect payment from the YSA? You promised. And if you can't keep your word, why on earth shpuld lebo go further into debt so your little chip off the block can play soccer at night three months a year? Grow up, lebo. You can't always have it your way.

Anonymous said...

Thanks, Bill, for pointing out the existence of the CIP. Funny, it wasn’t mentioned at the Commission meeting last week while discussion occurred around turfing Mellon’s field.

None of this makes sense to me. If the five-year plan is approved and viewed as public information, then why aren’t those who are lobbying for agendas outside of the plan being directed back to it? Why are these agendas being entertained and supported by a Commissioner(s)? What is the use of producing a plan if it is going to be ignored?

What am I missing???

-Charlotte Stephenson

Anonymous said...

So the District has engaged a quality fundraiser to raise $30,000,000 for the high school financing and the education of our children and the NSF athletic supporters are thinking about a competing fundraiser for about $850,000?

And the District doesn't have the guts to tell the deadbeats to wait their turn?

We have serious problems on both the Board and the Commission folks. Competing fundraising doesn't work. If our kids don't get educated because the deadbeats don't have common sense we all know who to blame - folks whose first name is Dave and a raft of their buddies.

John Ewing

Lebo Citizens said...

John, that article was from 2009. There is no ompeting fundraising.
Elaine

Lebo Citizens said...

Competing. Sorry.
Elaine

Anonymous said...

Thank you, Elaine

John Ewing

Anonymous said...

While the bookkeeping for sports organizations may be dissimilar to accounting for the Wayne Foundation, I still wonder --

If the Concession Stand at your Dixon field is owned by the town, how does a sports organization claim depreciation on the structure as the MLBA does every year? Even in years when it does not indicate any "Land and Buildings" on its balance sheet.

Depreciation is an expense that does not consume cash and here yet it is used each year to reduce the accumulated net assets. How does this work? Where did the currency go?

Bruce Wayne

Anonymous said...

According to their 2009 Form 990, Girls Softball turned over a $10,000 grant they received to the Muni for field maintenance !

And the Aqua Club paid $28,000 in pool rental fees. Believe they also contribute to the YSA, although they obviously have nothing to do with athletic fields.

990's can be very helpful in understanding how charitible non-profits operate.

Bill Lewis

Anonymous said...

Two questions. If the school district had an agreement with YSA for a $30,000 yearly contribution for field maintenance that number would show up as revenue in the balance reports would it not?
In 2008 YSA missed the agreed amount by $26,500 and 2010 by $20,000. Heaven knows what wasn't contributed from 1999 to 2007.
So why no alert in the audit reports?
Why would the district renew the agreement in 2010 if YSA shorted them in '08?

Technically you're correct Elaine, there aren't two fundraising events right now. But Ewing is partially correct also. I believe it was Mr. Adams that offered to launch a fundraising campaign to turf two fields and build an indoor Rec facility if the commission started the endeavor.
Giffen Good

Lebo Citizens said...

Giffen,
Your last question makes me wonder why the commission would renew the agreement if the contributions are going entirely to the school district.
I stand corrected. You are right about Mr. Adams' offer.
Elaine

Richard Gideon said...

As a public service, Blog readers may wish to visit GuideStar, a web site dedicated to public disclosure of non-profit entities. The URL is http://www.guidestar.org/. You may search the site for basic information about any registered non-profit charitable organization specified as 501(c)(3). By creating a basic GuideStar account (free) you may access IRS 990 forms, which are marked as "Open to Public Inspection." There are premium services available as well. This web site is an excellent resource for anyone doing basic research about a charitible organization. NOTE: not all tax-exempt entities are classified as 501(c)(3), so if you don't find any information about a particular organization it does not necessarily mean that the organization is not tax exempt. Non-profits come in several different "flavors."

Anonymous said...

Why would the commissioners renew the agreement?
One reason, because you have a commissioner approving the agreement despite an obvious conflict of interest.
Giffen Good

Lebo Citizens said...

Giffen, there are two commissioners with conflicts of interest. There is the obvious one, but my baggage-free commissioner, a.k.a. school district advocate/enabler, has a campaign committee attorney who served as secretary for two years for MLSA. Her name shows up on the campaign financial report. Her legal services were listed as in-kind contributions valued at $1000.
Elect Kristen Linfante

It is interesting to see who all contributed to her campaign.
Elaine

Richard Gideon said...

CORRECTION: In my post of 11:43am I stated, "NOTE: not all tax-exempt entities are classified as 501(c)(3)...". This should have read "NOTE: not all non-profit entities are classified as 501(c)(3)...". My apologies for the error.

Anonymous said...

MTL Home Rule Charter
Article X Section 1005.
Officials with Personal Interest in Contracts
No Commissioner, nor any other municipal officer or employee, shall participate, directly or indirectly, in the making of any contract on behalf of the Municipality for goods or services in which he is financially interested to any appreciable degree, except for the services for which he is specifically retained.

Couple of legal questions involved here for the legal beagles.
Does an agreement fall under the definition of a contract in municipal activities?
Would Commissioner Brumfield serving in an official capacity in the YSA constitute having a financial interest to any appreciable degree?

My opinion - yes it is an agreement between the three parties for a set period, there is a start date and an end date. Also a prescribed amount of money is changing hands.

If Mr. Brumfield is Field Director in the YSA, he certainly has an appreciable interest in the field's conditions and the expenses incurred in keeping those fields playable.

So therefore he had a conflict of interest and should not have been allowed to vote or even participate in the discussions pertaining to the agreement. He was in effect representing both sides.

Giffen Good

Anonymous said...

Then we have from the PA Public Official and Employee Ethics Act.

Contract — No public official or public employee or his spouse or child or any business in which the person or his spouse or child is associated shall enter into any contract valued at $500 or more with the governmental body with which the public official or public employee is associated or any subcontract valued at $500 or more with any person who has been awarded a contract with the governmental body with which the public official or public employee is associated, unless the contract has been awarded through an open and public process, including prior public notice and subsequent public disclosure of all proposals considered and contracts awarded. In such a case, the public official or public employee shall not have any supervisory or overall responsibility for the implementation or administration of the contract. Any contract or subcontract made in violation of Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act shall be voidable by a court of competent jurisdiction if the suit is commenced within 90 days of the making of the contract or subcontract.

Commissioner Brumfield voted on the YSA, School District and Municipality Field Maintenance Agreement. Since the 90 days past on instituting the agreement, apparently a court wouldn't void it.
Hope he does not get involved in another agreement when it expires June 30, 2012 or argue for any artificial turf or recreation alliances etc. with the YSA.

Giffen Good

Anonymous said...

Bruce Wayne, you nasty boy ! Nit pic all you want, but actually you're correct. The baseball boys didn't fill out tax returns according to instructions for 2009 and 2008, and the IRS apparently goes along with it. I have been purring over 990's for years looking for morsels, and have found countless errors and omissions in all manner of such returns apparently never observed and never required to be corrected. Relax, it's just typical government work. But the devil is always in the details - look at their 990 for 2007, Part IV, page 4! For some reason their 990 for 2010 is MIA on GuideStar ?

My feline spies tell me that the baseball boys paid for the concession building, something like $70,000, and outfitted it. It cost more than their estimate because the muni made them match the rec center building bricks, which were at a premium. Davy Franklin admitted in a recent commission meeting that the muni unions ended up with knotted undies cause the baseball boys tried to do the electrical work themselves to save money.

The commission agreed last month to allow the baseball boys to collect and retain the concession stand revenues. Wonder if there is a formal leasehold property lease agreement between the parties ?

Give my best to Robin, Alfred and Aunt Harriet, Bruce my dear,

Cat Woman

Anonymous said...

A couple more tidbits from the GuideStar postings :

1) the Mt. Lebanon Travel Hockey Assoc. 990 for 2010 indicates that they paid $170,830 for Ice Time....they have a member fee structure in place to cover facility costs; and,

2) the exempt status for the Mt. Lebanon Partnership (the Muni's Community Development Corporation development arm) and the Mt. Lebanon Soccer Foundation (not Association) have been automatically revoked by the IRS for failure to file applicable Form 990's for three (3) consecutive years. A number of other Lebo-based exempts have also been outed in this way.

Bill Lewis

Anonymous said...

Mr. Good,
Mr. Brumfield has been listed as the Field Director of the Youth Football Association, not the YSA, but your point about being interested in both sides is accurate from my perspective.

John Ewing

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Mr. Good,
Just to be clear,
Brian Walters has now replaced Mr. Brumfield as the Field Director for the YFA. However Mr Franklin is still the Director of Funding.

From the YFA website:
Brian Walters
Director of Fields
Dave Franklin
Director of Funding

John Ewing

May 4, 2012 12:21 AM

Anonymous said...

Thanks, for the info Mr. Ewing. Considering that Commissioner Brumfield has not explained where he got his estimate for turfing Mellon nor retracted his conjecture that maintaining the turf will run about $3,500/year, we've just been told how he'll be voting on Mellon turfing.
Giffen Good

Anonymous said...

I'm surprised we haven't seen Matt Smith ride to his democrat compatriots rescue with state WAM funds.
Godfrey Hardy

Anonymous said...

Gee Mr. Good, it costs the District $2,600 to process a Right-to-Know request - almost as much as Mr. Brumfield's estimate of the annual turf maintenance cost at Mellon Field.

It would be interesting to file a Right-to-Know request with the District to find out the cost of maintaining and grooming the HS turf, and also the cost of lighting the Field which I recall Mr. Brumfield forgot to mention.

John Ewing

Anonymous said...

Minnesota's Target Field is LEED certified with natural grass, not turf:
http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20100412&content_id=9245468&notebook_id=9248136

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20100408&content_id=9141798

Maybe we can simply get the existing school fields LEED certified instead.

David Huston

Lebo Citizens said...

Please sign your comments, especially when you are taking shots at specific people who have the courage to use their own names.
Elaine