Monday, May 5, 2014

Inconsistencies from Brumfield & Co.

I have been trying to keep track of all the stories I have heard concerning turf at Middle and Wildcat Fields. I believe it started with changing the Sign Ordinance. We were told that this amendment will enable the Municipality to sell sponsor signage at our local fields. Did everyone see the single sign sold at Dixon Field? 

Dave Franklin wrote on his Lebo Fields blog 
"We need this stream of revenue and we have to get creative," resident David Franklin told commissioners. Franklin said Dick's Sporting Goods paid $2.2 million for the naming rights to Dick's Sporting Goods Sportsplex in Graham Park, located in Cranberry Township.
Fact: Dick's Sporting Goods wrote a check [to Mt. Lebanon] for $5,000 and didn't even ask for a sign. - Steve Silverman

In the Post Gazette article, $750,000 OK'd for athletic field upgrades in Mt. Lebanon,


Ms. Linfante agreed, saying improvements "have been years in the making." Fact: It was not presented to Commissioner Fraasch until the beginning of November.  
"I do believe that this project will bring value to every single home in this community," she added. Fact: The recent FAQs for the Mt. Lebanon Assessment Appeal Program mentions nothing about the High School artificial turf adding value. 
"What properties have been appealed? A: The Municipality appealed the assessed value of residential properties that met the following criteria: 
  • Sales price greater than $100,000; 
  • Difference between sale price and assessed value of $58,000 or more; 
  • Ratio between assessed value and sale price of 80% or less for sales in 2006 through 2010 and sales in 2013; and 
  • Ratio between assessed value and sale price of less than 85% for sales that occurred in 2011 and 2012." 


The YSA presentation, page 5 claimed that adding artificial turf to Middle and Wildcat Fields "assumes you can have 2 simutaneous [sic] team practicing on this newly created space." Field teams could have simultaneous practices (space is largest in Mt. Lebanon), page 9.  and 
See page 12 of Field Enhancement Proposal 11.06.13 Fact: This sign is posted at the fields.

Will the sign be removed once the turf goes in?

Wildcat and Middle Fields are in terrible condition. Fact: See photo below.


Soccer will have its first and only regulation width field (70 yard).  See page 9 YSA 2012 Field Project Analysis & Recommendation John Bendel's presentation, page 7 claimed that the fields would be 170'x345' Fact: The soccer field will be 165x320, not 180x360. The area will be smaller than the High School and Jefferson fields.  Toxic Newcomers Turf will cost more

John Bendel's presentation, page 7 No additional lights at this time. Fact: Conduit is being added to the field for additional lights.

On November 8, 2010, the Mt. Lebanon Commissioners unanimously approved an ordinance authorizing an agreement allowing the School District to utilize 40 spaces in the commissioners’ lot during regular school hours. Shared Parking Agreement Is the Commissioners' Lot being properly maintained? Fact: See below.

 
Is this how they are going to maintain Middle and Wildcat Fields?


Artificial turf to be replaced every 8 years. Long-term Project Cost – 16 years Middle/Wildcat Project Page 14  Fact: See the three high school field photos below: 

Three years, ten months old

Three years, ten months old

Three years, ten months old

These fields never flood. Drainage improvements not required. See page 12 - Athletic Fields - Review of Alternatives Prepared by The Gateway Engineers, Inc. March 2012




"Based on estimates developed by the youth sports representatives this plan would have cost $750,000-$900,000. Included in those options would be an eco-friendly turf option."

Gateway's Opinion of Cost for organic fill $999,770 See page 13. Fact: New cost estimate is $1.57 million for organic infill. Commission Discussion Session April 28, 2014


"I did not believe that people were accurately reflecting what had occurred over the last few months when they discussed these issues."
                                                               - Dave Brumfield

Coming soon: Dave Brumfield shares his sources where, "Unfortunately the information you are being directed to [on Lebo Citizens] is inconsistent with studies from California, New York and even the Netherlands. This is not something that I or the Commissioners entered into without research. There is a reason that educational and governmental entities are installing turf at an ever increasing rate. For playability, predictability and efficiency it is the best surface."

20 comments:

Anonymous said...

"Oh What a Tangled Web We Weave When First We Practice to Deceive"
— Sir Walter Scott

Anonymous said...

If only we could subject Brumfield and the Commission majority to lie detector or truth serum questioning. I doubt any of these people have read the reports that Brummie refers to. Are they intentionally trying to deceive us believing no one will check out their representations and references ?

Anonymous said...

To bad our commissioners subscribe to this philosophy instead:
"If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit." — W.C. Fields

Anonymous said...

IMO, might just be first honest comment by any of the pro turf people yet.
""I did not believe that people were accurately reflecting what had occurred over the last few months when they discussed these issues." — Dave Brumfield

Hope he's referring to himself, the SAB, Franklin, Bendel, Linfante and Silverman

Anonymous said...

Hey Silverman, why did Dick's write the $5,000 check to Mt. Lebanon instead of instructions to make out donations to the Mt. Lebanon Community Endowment ?

Per the Feb,2014 SAB meeting minutes, might it be because they are really paying for signs and you schemers are allowing that money to also count towards the $250,000, like this allowed ruse previously hidden from the public was revealed in the minutes ? Is double counting and two sets of accounting books part and parcel of your deceptive practices associated with the turf project ?

Anonymous said...

5:39, are you telling me Jan Klein isn't the only one who double counts?

Anonymous said...

Gateway pulls yet more costs estimates out of their... aaaaa.. er... um... 'hat!"

Anonymous said...

Another bright idea from the Lebo Commission.
PAYT Recycling.

http://www.post-gazette.com/local/city/2014/05/05/Bankruptcy-judge-approves-sale-of-rat-infested-recycling-site-in-Hazelwood/stories/201405050186

Don't say we didn't warn you of the pitfalls. Guess where all the recycables from the Hazelwood and Lawrenceville sites will eventually end up!

Anonymous said...

What about concussions, Mr. Brumfield? Someone should call 60 Minutes -- this is better than Mayberry!

Anonymous said...

6:13, Would Robb Hollow Park be a good guess for Lawrenceville and Hazelwood waste?

Anonymous said...

Why not take a lesson from liberals and call Dick's and explain WHY you, your family and friends will no longer shop at their stores. If 30-35 people spend a couple of hours walking in circles outside Dick's at South Hills Village protesting this moronic turf idea all three News Channels would be there filming. There's enough wrongs here to grab the attention of most people. You'll get the people who hate wasting money for 2000 kids. You'll have the EnviroNuts. The people against the health risks. And the TRUE athletes that have experience with turf related injuries.

Anonymous said...

Just go to twitter and do this little experiment:

Search "turf sucks" and then search "grass sucks". I do hate the word "sucks" but this is how the average kid speaks these days.

For "turf sucks" you will see nasty images of turf burns and other injuries, along with stories. For "grass sucks" you will hear from a suburban kid who has to cut his/her lawn.

This is not empirically validated scientific research published in a peer reviewed journal indicating that grass is better than turf, but I'm just saying'...

Anonymous said...

http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/12/study-raises-questions-about-fieldturf/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0

Apparently, Brumfield hasn't read all the info on Field Turf that is coming out of New York.

Anonymous said...

Hey Brumfield, how about a little more reading on your part!
From the University of Arkansas:
"Synthetic (Artificial) Turf vs. Natural Grass Athletic Fields"
"Long-term costs
Long-term costs are less with natural turf fields compared to synthetic turf fields. Artificial fields need replacing every 8-10 years, whereas a natural turf field does not need as frequent renovation and can be renovated at a much reduced price compared to an artificial field. In a 16-year scenario, Fresenburg came up with an annual average cost for each field type as follows: the natural soil-based field, $33,522; the sand-cap grass field, $49,318; the basic synthetic field, $65,846; and the premium synthetic field, $109,013 (2)."

http://turf.uark.edu/turfhelp/archives/021109.html

Anonymous said...

Hey Silverman, regarding the Dick's $5,000 check with allegedly no strings (read that signs) attached ?

Were you not personally working hard on Dick's just prior to and following your election as a Commissioner for a really, really big donation ? One that would have required that all Lebo youth sports groups buy all their equipment and clothing & uniforms from Dick's ? Weren't you fully behind that quid pro quo back room deal, aided and abetted perhaps by Deiseroth, Donnellan and Grogan, but at least one of the biggie youth sports groups balked at that and it died a proper death ? Come on Steve, level with us ! Are you the kind of guy who believes that any means justify the sought after end result ?

Anonymous said...

Let's look at Kelly Frasch's blog that I went to read about PW building update. Why is it so inconsistent among the Commissioners? They must get the same materials. Would only one be reading the actual material? How can Kelly Frasch write this blog on the concerns about turf and the others, well, don't have the same concerns. http://www.kellyfraasch.com/2014/03/13/concerns-about-crumb-rubber-infill/
Does the staff feed them different information depending where they lean on an issue?

Unknown said...

12:06PM

Other commissioners choose to ignore all the other information out in the world, which really reassures me that they are doing the best job a person can do.

Anonymous said...

Hey Silverman, did your campaign literature and door-to-door contact disclose that your principal efforts as a Commissioner would be devoted to turfing Wildcat and Middle fields and voting against any Robb Hollow field possibilities to insure money for artificial turf ?

Anonymous said...

http://www.hometeamsonline.com/teams/?u=LEBOLAX&s=htosports&t=c

Anonymous said...

NO safe level of lead for kids --- is anyone listening. That is why the paint industry had to change its formulae. That is why landlords have to scrape and paint. That is why sellers must disclose lead paint, just like asbestos. Is anyone listening?

The list of benefits of artificial turf for kids'

CONCUSSIONS. BRAIN DAMAGE. CANCER. IT'S ALL FOR THE KIDS!