Sunday, September 30, 2012

What are their answers?



October 3, 2012

7-8:30 a.m. at Uptown Coffee on Washington Road
Coffee with 
Josephine Posti, Mary Birks and Larry Lebowitz 


October 4, 2012

7-8:30 p.m. at Orbis Caffe on Washington Road 
Coffee with 
Elaine Cappucci, Dale Ostergaard, Mary Birks and Bill Cooper

Invitation to the 2012 Photo Section Galleria Show

The Photographic Section of the Academy of Science and art of Pittsburgh invites you to its 2012 Photography Exhibit, Friday, October 5 - Wednesday, October 17 at the Galleria Mall in Mt. Lebanon.
 
Please pass this information along to friends, family and other members of your organization.
 
For more information:  http://www.pghphoto.org/



Saturday, September 29, 2012

Best advice

In the latest issue of mtl Magazine, Susan Morgans shares her thoughts on the best advice. http://lebomag.com/7156/in-this-issue/
What was the best advice anyone ever gave you?
That question prompted a lively debate on our deck one evening this past summer with people of various ages sharing good advice they had received ranging from the serious to the seemingly silly.
My parents and other caring adults surely gave me thoughtful advice that I followed, but I can’t recall their words specifically. What I remember more clearly are random comments that turned out to be useful advice.
This got me thinking about an anonymous comment which I approved on the thread, Posti too busy for Commission

Anonymous said...
I only occasionally come upon your blog and am certainly not a regular reader, but those time that I have, I notice that you do have hate in your heart. Jo Posti was right.

Did you ever watch the Muppet Show in the 1970's? Do you remember those grumpy old guys who sat up in the balcony? They never actually did anything but just criticized the performers. You and some of the commentors here ("anonymous" ones and otherwise) remind me of them, criticizing everyone but not actually doing anything except, in your case, running a blog -- which is fine, but unlike those you so readily and pettily criticize, you have zero accountability.

Instead of being defensive, if someone tells you you have hate in your heart, you should think about it.

September 27, 2012 2:32 PM
Oddly, both comments are conveying the same message to me. Maybe Jo's prayers are working.

Friday, September 28, 2012

Wait, Is it Morgan or Stadium?

I am getting confused. Change order #GC-03-03 is to Nello Construction for repair of Morgan Drive as required by the Municipality totals $63,148.

In my post of September 17, 2012, Not $30 Million...Not $15 million... where I wrote:
On another note, Peterson has instructed the Board to litigate $63,148 (cost of repaving Morgan Drive) with the Municipality after the project is completed.
I sent this email to Steve Feller on September 18, 2012.
At last night's School Board meeting, a change order was approved for the work done on Morgan Drive. Their solicitor advised the School Board to litigate the amount of $63,148 because they believe it is the fault of the Municipality and Gateway.  Have you responded either verbally or in writing to the District's claim?
Elaine
I promptly received this scorcher from my commissioner.
Ms. Gillen,

I have spoken with numerous officials at the SD today about this rumor, and NONE of them told me that the SD plans to sue the
municipality. Mr. Remely, when discussing the change order, asked
their solicitor how they, if they were to choose to do so, would go
about seeking funds from someone other than the SD to pay for the
re-paved road. The solicitor did not "advise litigation" as you
suggest. He did tell them that such a process was an option. The
change order vote passed, and it was decided that the SD would speak with the other parties (architect, contractor, Muni., etc) to discuss the issue further.

In addition, Mr. Feller and Dr. Steinhauer are in contact often, as
affirmed by Mr. Feller today. At this time, there is no reason to
respond to a false rumor or misinterpretation. Talks are ingoing
bewteen our staffs, as always.

I hope this clarifies any confusion you may have had about the SD's discussion.

Kristen Linfante
Commissioner, Ward 3

A follow up comment on the blog on September 18 at 3:38 PM was approved:
Let's be clear here...anyone can go back to the podcast and make no mistake that both Dan and JoPo were throwing the municipal engineer under the bus.

The idea that now Kristen comes back and says there will be no lawsuit is a little early in the process I think. No doubt the school district will keep all options on the table until this is resolved.

I wonder if the municipality responded to the school board meeting from last week or not. I am sure they heard the comments from Dan and Jo. And I am also sure that if I was them, I would not appreciate one of my employees being thrown to the wolves for doing his job just so the board could blame someone else for its change order.

Here is what was received from Steve Feller when asked for a municipal response. It was obtained through a Right To Know.

Communication from Municipal Engineer RTK Rus Del Ra, the contractor contact seemed a little cranky over Horsman and Stadium Drives.

Either all the information was not granted in the Right To Know Request, there was no response over the school board meeting when Gateway was thrown under the bus, or the change order was listed for the wrong road.  Does anyone out there know anything differently? Kristen, I don't need to get another scorcher from you.

Sewage Bill in Your Mail Box UPDATED

If you haven't received your sewage bill from Jordan Tax Service, you should be getting it in today's mail. Prior to this, Alcosan and Mt. Lebanon charges were billed on your water bill. For me, this means I have to write a check to Jordan Tax Service monthly instead of having it electronically deducted from my bank account. I thought I could write one check a year to Jordan, but that has now changed. There is no option to pay this bill electronically.

About that stormwater fee that was mailed out to everyone, including churches and temples, let me remind you that Raja was behind that fee.  He always talks about how he cut taxes, but he never mentions how even the tax exempt folks are getting charged with the largest fee increase in the history of Mt. Lebanon.

Updated September 28, 2012 2:11 PM According to Susan Morgans' never dated release on the Municipal website,
By October, Jordan hopes to provide electronic billing options.

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

REACH OUT & HELP BEAUTIFY
MT. LEBANON PARK
 
Saturday, September 29, from 9 am. to noon

The Mt. Lebanon Commission & others who love our community’s precious greenspace invite you to help them spruce up our historic main park.

BRING YOUR FAMILY, FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS!

THANK YOU FOR PARTICIPATING IN OUR COMMUNITY OUTREACH EFFORT. LET’S HAVE SOME FUN AND SHOW OUR LEBO PRIDE!

Please enter the park off Cedar Boulevard and park in the Recreation Center lot. A volunteer check-in table will be located near the playground equipment.
Work may include weeding, picking up sticks and trash or cleaning play areas. Come dressed comfortably (with gloves or gardening tools, if possible) for a one-hour shift, but stay as long as you want.

Information: Contact public information, 412-343-3407, smorgans@mtlebanon.org

PK has quite a racket going

Greater Latrobe School District had hired Pursuant Ketchum in 2011 to do a feasibility study to raise $15 million.  Sound familiar?

Through a Right To Know (I didn't realize this could be done), the results and contract follow.
Greater Latrobe Fundraising Study
Of Counsel Philanthropy

What I find interesting is how thorough PK was with Greater Latrobe. The first link is 42 pages. Either our school board is holding back or PK didn't put as much effort into our study as they had with Greater Latrobe. The second link is the 8 page consulting agreement.  I guess this is what we are in for...

Monday, September 24, 2012

Are you in the 7%?

The School District website has released the SPECIAL STUDY AND REPORT ON THE FUNDRAISING POTENTIAL OF MT. LEBANON SCHOOL DISTRICT With twenty hours remaining to vote on poll, fifty one votes have been cast. So far, there are four individuals (7%) who are willing to donate.

In concert with creating communications materials that explain the strategic vision, the School District must heighten the community’s awareness of the importance of philanthropy, now and in the future. An integrated and multifaceted Awareness and Cultivation Program should be planned and implemented as an integral part of pre- campaign activities and procedures.
To initiate a Targeted Awareness-Building and Cultivation Program, I am asking those four individuals to send an email to schoolboard@mtlsd.net explaining that you were in the 7% of the Lebo Citizens poll and would like to donate. Thank you so much for understanding the importance of philanthropy. With your help, it could mean only $18 a month for me. If those 7% do come forward, I just identified four donors for free. That is my donation - that and heightening the community's awareness.

To read more about this in the School Board President Reports, don't go here.  Go here.  Or here.

Friday, September 21, 2012

Letter to the Editor: The Importance of Being Earnest UPDATED 2x

The following letter to the editor was submitted by Blog reader and Mt. Lebanon resident, Bill Matthews.

Several years ago, the Municipality embarked on a second journey to develop the property on Washington Road, across from where I attended first and second grade. We began our trip with an RFQ (Request for Qualifications). The thought was that by seeking out an established developer with the demonstrated credentials to build on this site, we would avoid the delays and ultimate failure experienced with the site's predecessor project. It was a good plan and we in fact received a response and proposal from one such firm.

Then we picked the other one. 

Zamagias Properties showed no experience developing residential condominiums when the firm was first selected to develop this property and handed more than $1,000,000 in TIF loan proceeds. Following a review of their website this morning, it appears not much has changed. Please see the attached letter I sent to the Commission regarding this project, more than six years ago. My letter includes the firm's original submission to demonstrate their competencies. 

The Municipality's web site indicates there will be a "Zamagias update" on October 22. It is time for the Commission to move on with a developer who maintains a successful track record for developing first class projects appropriate for this site. If the Commission elects to continue its partnership with this developer, it must also insist on the developer making good on the TIF loan. 

Bill

Update September 23, 2012 11:00 AM In response to today's 7:25 AM comment, Bill Matthews felt it was easier to post the documents rather than try to describe the repurchase agreement and extension.
Zamagias - MLPA Sales Agreement The repurchase section is on page 15 of the agreement.
Zamagias Agreement 6th amendment Note: The seventh amendment was in January 2012.

Update September 24, 2012 11:59 AM Here is supporting evidence of the conflict of interest mentioned in Bill Lewis' item number three of his 6:05 PM comment. Ballon Conflict of interest Ballon was the vice chairman of the Parking Authority and remained so until dismissed in July 2011.

Thursday, September 20, 2012

PA Cyber cleans house

In yesterday's Post Gazette,
PA Cyber Charter School fires most top managers:

"The Pennsylvania Cyber Charter School board has axed its director, finance director, personnel director, compliance officer and a longtime lawyer, in a near-sweep of its top management that education experts on Tuesday characterized as highly unusual and potentially damaging in the long term."
There was no mention of former Mt. Lebanon School Board President, Joe Rodella this time. My August 12 post, Former School Board president's PA Cyber connections prompts federal inquiry, the Post Gazette stated that the FBI, the Internal Revenue Service and a federal grand jury were probing some people who have been associated with PA Cyber, including Mr. Rodella.

Posti too busy for Commission

At last week's Commission discussion meeting, Joint Discussion Meetings was an agenda item. Evidently, the Commission has been trying to set up another meeting between the School Board and the Commission to discuss, among other things, the Joint Maintenance Agreement. Remember that fateful night when Josephine Posti said that I have hate in my heart, so she was praying for me? Apology to Josephine Posti That meeting included Dave Brumfield, Kristen Linfante, Steve Feller, Elaine Cappucci, and Josephine Posti.  There has not been another meeting since February 28.

In Citizens' Comments, I expressed my feelings and thanked Dave and Kristen for all the abuse they were getting from Josephine Posti. It was revealed during the Discussion Session that Josephine wanted to see an agenda before she would commit to another meeting. I had said that if the Commission felt that they should have another meeting, then they should have a meeting. This time, the Commission wanted to have a public meeting with as many Commissioners and School Board Directors present, as possible.

In so many words, Josephine blew off the Commission. So I filed a Right To Know on September 13, 2012, asking for all communication between the Commission and School Board Directors concerning joint meetings between Municipal and School Board representatives. 

Here it is. Not only is she much too busy for any meetings, but Josephine also encouraged the Commissioners to attend the School Board coffees along with the rest of us.
Joint Discussion Communication

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Right To Know granted for inspection reports

On September 6, 2012, I filed a Right To Know for all daily inspection reports from the project’s testing and inspection firm concerning site work for the high school construction project. My request was granted today. There are forty files which I have uploaded into this folder on Google Docs.
Inspection reports

Too bad I don't get paid for this

Pittsburgh Business Times wants to honor women  in business at both for-profits and non-profits who've made a difference in their communities. Unfortunately, I don't get paid for this. I don't think teaching sewing at a community college counts either. However, I believe the School District and a Commissioner or two think I am leaving a mark on the community.

 

2013 Women in Business Awards nominations

Deadline: December 21, 2012

Presented by the Pittsburgh Business Times, the 2013 Women in Business Awards honor the region's most influential business women at both for-profits and non-profits. We're looking for women from every industry and profession; women who've made a difference in their communities, blazed a trail for other women and are leaving a mark on the western Pennsylvania business community.

Nominees must be female residents of western Pennsylvania who are employed in the region.
A nominee should be an established business leader with a strong record of innovation in her field with outstanding performance in her business or non-profit or organization.

Nominees will be judged on their role as business or non-profit leaders. We're looking for entrepreneurs and executives whose efforts are molding their workplace and their industry.

Nominations should include as much detail as possible about a nominee's specific business accomplishments. We're looking for real tangible results, as in "She increased the company's sales last year by 40%, bringing in AOL and Nextel as clients."

Nominees do not have to be the owners or presidents of their organizations. We do not publicize the name of the person who enters a nomination.

Please answer all of the questions completely and refrain from any supplementary collateral. Any nominations submitted in a press release format will not be accepted.

PNC is the presenting sponsor for the 2013 Women in Business Awards.

To enter a nomination, visit our nomination page.

If you have questions, contact Richard Cerilli, rcerilli@bizjournals.com, 412-208-3815.

Spin Class 101

The Feasibility Study Presentation has been pitched. The results are in, but what were we studying? There seems to be some confusion as to the purpose of the Feasibility Study. Was the purpose to determine the amount of money we could successfully raise? Or was it a feasibility study on whether or not a capital campaign could raise $30 million?

I found some links which may shed some light on the matter.  

Pursuant Ketchum first must determine if the district can create a "compelling case" for people to give. The district is discussing donations to reduce the amount it must borrow to complete the $109 million project.
The board would need to hire at least one person to help coordinate the efforts and the money, leaving some directors hesitant when the district already is facing a budget shortfall even with a potential half-mill tax increase.
Administrative costs for a fund-raising campaign would be about 7 percent of what was raised, Oshry said.

Two consultants will spend the next few weeks interviewing some of the district's biggest potential donors and likely volunteer fundraisers. They will use the interviews to determine whether the district can make a compelling case for people to donate; whether there are enough potential donors and volunteers; and whether the timing is right to conduct such a campaign.
The consultants will then present the board with their recommendations in the form of a "red light," "yellow light" or "green light," officials said last week.
"Even if we got a red light ... there's still a tremendous amount of information for us that could be very useful," said board president Josephine Posti.
Paving the way to establish an endowment:
Though the campaign was pitched as a way to reduce the amount of borrowing for the high school -- and thus limit any future tax increases for debt payments -- board members amended the motion to remove language specifying that the study be limited to the high school project.
Here is the introduction of an endowment: 
The District is undertaking the study to assess the viability of a capital campaign to reduce the amount of the second bond required for the $109.7 million high school project currently under construction and to establish an endowment to sustain and grow academic and fine arts programs in the District.
The school board voted last month to hire fundraising consultants Pursuant Ketchum to conduct the professional analysis that will determine whether they have enough support to raise $30 million for the high school renovation project.
The study costs $41,000 plus travel expenses.
"We view the study as a necessary investment in preparing for a successful capital campaign to finance a portion for the renovation of Mt. Lebanon High School," said John Federico, president of the Mt. Lebanon Foundation for Education in a statement.
April 26, 2012 Two $10,000 Grants to Help Fund Feasibility Study Posti writes on Center Court:
This $20,000 will cover approximately half of the cost of the $41,000 feasibility study that the Board engaged in last month in order to assess readiness for a capital campaign.
The School District feasibility study will assess the viability of a capital campaign, and appropriate strategies for conducting it. Contributions to the campaign would be used to offset existing costs of the Mt. Lebanon Senior High School renovation, as well as build a permanent endowment to support curriculum and other educational needs of the district.
“The Mt. Lebanon School District’s expressed its desire to conduct a successful capital campaign in order to reduce the tax burden associated with the high school renovation and benefit all residents of Mt. Lebanon, especially our most vulnerable citizens” said Joseph King, President of MLCE’s Board of Directors.
Here is the switcheroo: 

Ms. Bowman said this feasibility study wasn't about identifying donors but about soliciting advice and feedback.
The interviews are based on the idea that the district would try a $15 million capital campaign, though other sums have been considered. Those interviewed -- "a cross section of the community" -- are told funds raised could go toward a program endowment or bricks-and-mortar development at the high school, Ms. Bowman said.
School directors feel that alumni and residents could be ideal donors:
Capital campaigns of this size usually occur at universities or civic organizations, but school directors have said that Mt. Lebanon's alumni network and residents could be ideal future donors.
Oshry guarantees:
He also told the board the study comes with a few guarantees -- whether it signals possibility for a campaign or not, the study could identify and gauge community interest, he said.

At Monday's meeting, PK announces the number to be $6 million, not $30 million.  I guess that is a green light.

In March, we're told about 7% for a $30 million campaign. 
On September 17, we're told 14% for a $6 million campaign.

So which is it?  Was it a feasibility study on whether or not a capital campaign could raise $30 million? Or was the purpose to determine the amount of money we could successfully raise? 

This concludes Spin Class 101.

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Pursuant Ketchum Summary

Someone was nice enough to summarize the PK presentation for Blog Readers.

Oshry talks and notes that PK was invited to test feasability of $15 million capital and endowment campaign for high school and creation of endowment.

Conducted:
27 confidential interviews
16 parents or alumnni
9 current or former board members
11 suggested by someone else in study
1 recommended to make lead gift in campaign


70% had positive view of district
School board does not make decisions that are always popular
78% rate project as high or reasonably high
67% think capital and endowment plan is the right plan
74% think campaign is best way to raise money
5 people think it is not and should share cost via tax
81% advocated proceeding with campaign
Caution about proceeding because there was confusion of where funds would go- pay down debt or endowment
Some people only interested in capital
Some only interested in endowment

Possibility of $15 million
67% felt 15 million attainable
People did not have answer to "who" would come up with the money.
Higher degree of confidence by those who have done major gift giving before
Did not uncover first hand evidence of top ten gifts they were looking for
1/3 felt they could find $3 million gift
When asked for who six of the 30 named $50,000 was largest gift identified
Some did not indicate if they would give money...needed more info
24 of 30 were not interviewed

37 people suggested named people with 11 people suggested multiple time
interviewed 12 of the 37. 9 of 12 indicated they would take a leadership role in fundraising
85% said they would serve in some capacity.
89% said they would be willing to give something
These were good results

Board is untested in its ability to lead a campaign

Recommendations:
1st is to proceed with campaign with $6 million capital and endowment as goal.
Campaign would move community to be positively influence (cultural change)
Address structure to do campaign-small task force to define scope of responsiblity...mlfe/mt lebanon endowment
School district must define its scope of campaign
Enlist steering committee- focus on campaign chair, participating in expanded case for support, prospect cultivation, etc
Update expand existing policies with regards to endowment
Plan and implement a targeted awareness program. 
Form a planned giving program (Estate planning with school district in mind)
Staffing and budget for the campaign...currently no staff and no budget for campaign
March 2015 finished with implementation and possibly finished with first fundraising efforts...long after second bond

Questions from Board:
Dale thanks Oshry and says he appreciates the blueprint given to the Board. Asks if the 27 interviews were statistically significant.  Oshry says that it is. They are NOT looking for a sample of the community but instead for a sample that represents the right portion of the community. Asks about how arrived at $6 million while recognizing only one gift of any substance.  Oshry says two ways, looking at what was heard or not heard when people had the $15 number in front of them. Good to hear about support in community.  Need to establish a culture of philantropy in Mt. Lebanon and the culure would grow.  Has Oshry seen that culutre grow in other of his jobs...Oshry says National Rehabilitation Hosptial in DC was case study given to say that it can be done. Started at $3 million, then moved to $5 million, then more.

Need to do major gift first to get the smaller gifts later...not the other way around.

Cappucci- Concern with spending money on staffing before money comes in. Do you have a record of how successful you have been...how close have you come to the amount that is expected to be raised.  Oshry says campaigns reach or exceed the goal with 87% of the cases.  The ones that fail, fail badly.  Often the engagement is either redefined or scoped changed.  Budget proposed is 14% budget.  Within industry standards. With relatively modest goal with no experience the 14% is at the high/safe range of what should be expected.  Cappucci says money would not come in for several years.  Years 2 and 3 would expect major committments.  But other gifts wouldnt be until 2019 and 2020.  When we set up to do report it was to offset the bonds.  Now that he says this can no longer be the goal, should we shift the focus/campaign.  He says no.

Kubit-Thanks for the report. Were there indications on what donors were doing for the endowment...arts, sports, etc? A lot of people said arts and athletics, their favorite program saved by the endowment.

Remely- Likes the report. Doesn't see anything for the small donation for the small family that wants to buy a brick.  Establish a endowment is important. It may be the endowment or lack of endowment but monies to capital campaign will be more important to the campaign because it saves interest.  Asks Oshry if he will meet the goal and come in on budget.  Oshry says yes.  Can't pay down bond. Not a lot of options if money is not raised for second bond for high school.

Posti- Asks about the DC Hospital. Asks if naming rights came up at all.  It was not a major focus of this study.

Dan asks question about money not coming in for 6 or 7 years....if in first year and a half they have to pay him the $800,000 how does that happen.  Consultants are not paid on how much is raised, they are paid on time...in 30 months will you have paid for yourself.  Will the district be upside down on this?  Yes, we will be in the negative.  Good, insightful question by Dan and the answer is worrisome. Dan's question at the end about whether the district will need to pay money and be out of pocket while all this fundraising goes on is a good one. Basically the district will need to find the almost $900,000 to pay PK to do the fundraising and that has to be budgeted for....and I don't believe that includes a school staff person to direct fundraising.

 

Monday, September 17, 2012

Not $30 million...not $15 million...

The new number that Pursuant Ketchum presented tonight is... Drumroll, please... $6 million. For the low, low price of $840,000 which is 14% of $6 million, PK can raise $3 million in endowment and $3 million in capital. I hear that Dan Remely actually gets it. Dan said that if we pursue this, after PK gets their cut plus whatever we spend, plus the money won't arrive for five or six years, it's a wash. This was after we spent $44,000 ($10,000 from MLFE and $10,000 MLCE.) Don't forget, we have to create a full-time position dedicated solely to fundraising, only to raise $6 million that won't come in until three years after the high school project is complete and won't be applied to its original intent which was to prevent floating another bond. No colors were mentioned- no green light, yellow light, or red light.

On another note, Peterson has instructed the Board to litigate $63,148 (cost of repaving Morgan Drive) with the Municipality after the project is completed.

It was nice to hear that more people were in attendance this evening.

Mt. Lebanon School District Geotechnical Report

Thanks to Jeanine Szalinski's hard work and to Bill Matthew's financial support for the Right To Know, I picked up the geotechnical report from the school district this morning.  Here it is. Geotechnical report According to page 83 of 88 pages, CEC sent a letter (addendum) to Mrs. Kathy Stoughton of Celli Flynn Brennan claiming that a tested sample indicated a pyrite content of 0.27%. The letter states that "Materials containing as little as 0.1% pyrite have been documented to produce heaving in lightly loaded structures such as floor slabs or utilities if conditions are right."

Don't tell the wood flooring folks about this or else they will not stand behind their warranty. But let's just keeping on moving forward, folks.

Update September 17, 2012 1:15 PM Generalized Soil Profile as promised.

My commissioner is pushing deer culling again

According to the Commission Discussion Session agenda for September 24, 2012, the Commissioners are placing a conference call at 6:30 PM to Laura Simon regarding deer options. Ms. Simon, a nationally renowned wildlife expert from the Humane Society of the United States, will address issues related to the humane management of urban deer populations. One half hour is allocated on the agenda for this phone call. I see that she will be meeting with folks in Austin, Texas on Thursday. National expert to discuss humane management of urban wildlife

Unfortunately, my commissioner has sent out an email to her deer culling advocates, urging them to contact their commissioners to have another deer culling for 2013. At several meetings, Kristen Linfante has admitted that she is the lone wolf on this topic. Even past president, Dan Miller, has expressed his concern with deer culling in Mt. Lebanon. Commissioner Kelly Fraasch has this to say about deer culling in Mt. Lebanon in her blog post Position on Deer Culling.

I am very disappointed with my commissioner for advocating another deer culling, without listening to what an expert has to say on the topic, let alone what Dan Miller experienced in his ward while commissioner.




Friday, September 14, 2012

Did we pass the Ketchup?

Pursuant Ketchum was scheduled to present the results of the Feasibility Study at 7 p.m. on Monday, September 17, 2012. There is no mention of the presentation on the District website. The agenda and two policy revisions have been posted.


I do hope this is an oversight, as the Feasibility Study results would make for good conversation at the Community Coffee scheduled for September 18 from 7-8:30 p.m. at The Coffee Tree Roasters on Beverly Road.  Scott Goldman, Bill Cooper, Dale Ostergaard and Jo Posti will be present to have an informal conversation about issues such as spending $41,000 plus travel expenses to fund the study. A little background information: PK was hired to give us a green light, yellow light, or red light to predict the success of raising $30 million $15 million to reduce the need for a second bond issue for the high school renovation to set up an endowment.

Geotechnical report coming Monday

Through a 9/8/12 Right To Know, I am receiving a copy of the geotechnical report referenced in "Potential Project Cost Savings Worksheet" dated 8/8/2011. This time, it will cost me $21.75. The report should be available for pick up on Monday. Up until now, I have been able to get RTKs granted and sent via email. There were no charges for copies at twenty five cents per copy. The School District is allowed to charge for copies, but I hope this isn't the start of a new trend. If so, I will need to start a RTK fund! As soon as I receive the geotechnical report, I will scan it and post it here.

I would like to add that Mrs. Szalinski was quite pleasant when I called her with questions.  Thanks for your quick response, Mrs. Szalinski. The original response was sent via email and the following people were cc'ed:
Thomas Peterson TPeterson@tuckerlaw.com,
Dr. Timothy Steinhauer TSteinhauer@mtlsd.net,
Richard Marciniak RMarciniak@mtlsd.net,
Robb, Gavin grobb@tuckerlaw.com

Final Potential Cost Savings Worksheet is here

My Right To Know of September 10, 2012 was granted this morning. I asked for the final version of the “Potential Cost Savings Worksheet.” To my surprise, it includes associated costs in the final version. Thank you, Mrs. Szalinski, for granting my request so quickly.

Final Cost Savings Worksheet

Notice Line Item 23. We saved $90,000 because OWPP said that according to CEC correspondence to MTLSD, pyrite remediation is not needed.

Thursday, September 13, 2012

This is disgusting!

Remember how Zamagias planned to build $42.8 million worth of  luxury condos on the corner of Washington Road and Bower Hill Road and Mt. Lebanon agreed to a TIF in 2007? Well, it "ain't gonna happen."  
Downtown-based Zamagias Properties planned the $42.8 million Washington Park project for the corner of Washington and Bower Hill roads and Mt. Lebanon municipal and school district officials agreed in 2007 to a tax increment financing plan, or TIF, that allowed Zamagias to borrow money to buy the land and plan for construction. Part of the money from property taxes on the condos would go into a fund to repay the loans.

When the suggested condo prices of $300,000 to $1.1 million prevented enough sales to begin construction during the recession, Zamagias withdrew the project in 2010. That meant no tax money going into the company’s debt service fund to repay the $1.79 million it owes by next year.

Neither the municipality nor the school district lost any money on the project, Feller said. Both collect taxes on the value of the unimproved land; only tax money from any buildings would go into the debt service fund.
Zamagias bought the land from the Mt. Lebanon Parking Authority. (Remember them?)

Construction RTKs are starting to arrive

Several RTKs were granted this morning with three more pending.  All you detail guys, architects, builders, engineers...please take a look at the 455 pages of construction meeting minutes.

Also, here are the notes from the Construction Update on September 10, 2012 concerning change orders:
Construction Update Change Order Conversation from 9/10 Notes

Due to complexity of issues they have encountered they have started weekly meetings with Celli-Flynn to make everyone aware of everything that is out there.

#1- $63000 Nello Const due to moving sewer lines due to request of municipality. Dan Remely completely blamed municipal engineer for increased cost. "Municipal Engineer did not do his job when he approved the plan". Posti chimes in blames the municipal engineer for not being familiar with the paving ordinance. "Why did they not have the specs for the pavement itself....who did not catch that?". Marciniak says the trench ended up having to be dug wider and there were some unforseen conditions on subbase and had to go to subgrade which made this a bigger deal. Posti say municipality may have paved the street with subpar subbase that the SD has to replace. Sounds like what Rick said is true...contractor simply had to dig a bigger hole. But both Dan and Posti would rather point the finger at the municipal engineer.

#2- $30,000 to Nello for work required to relocated storm and sewer lines to clear way for new foundations in athletic and science buildings. Shouldn't the drawings have show this?

#3- Fairfield Electric for duct bank incoming feed for DQ Light for Athletic and Science. Add two pipes and duct bank. DQE looked at loads required by science builing required additional feed. Saved $200,000 on bid but came back $60,000 on the other end per Dan's math.

#4 IT department Fairfield electric add $12000 for cable feed from B Building to MDF in F building. Running Cat3 (phone) cable instead of Cat5 (data).
#5 Vrabel Plumbing $17,000 site utlity conflicts with caisons and side beams. Shouldn't the drawings have shown this?

#6 $25,000 credit to use PVC piping instead of copper for pipes 2.5 inches or smaller in non-plenum rated spaces. All PVC will be indoor. Shouldn't the drawings have shown where they could use indoor PVC vs outdoor rated copper?

#7 Nello $11,000 change one retaining wall for frost depth and $5000 to replace unsuitable material with concrete. Board blames the architect.

Ed with Pyrite...south end of science building and north end of building. Seems to be limited to these sites at this time. Another half to pyritic soil change that has yet to be submitted.

Fairfield $272,000 related to 5kV power loss. OSEPA or Builders Insurance Claim so it should not affect the project. Costs through 8/31. Generators taken offline day before meeting. 8/31-9/9 costs not yet submitted. Emergency repair would NOT be part of budget and likely will be covered by insurance as well. At most the District will be on the hook for the deductible per a question by Goldman.

Original change order for dirt may be gone...using rockpile dirt for fill now so costs from a few months back should be greatly reduced.

Something else I found out, OSHA has something to say about repairs to anchor bolts of columns. http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=25178

Section 1926.755(b) requires the following:
(1) Anchor rods (anchor bolts) shall not be repaired, replaced or field-modified without the approval of the project structural engineer of record.
(2) Prior to the erection of a column, the controlling contractor shall provide written notification to the steel erector if there has been any repair, replacement or modification of the anchor rods (anchor bolts) of that column.
According to §1926.752(a)(2), where anchor bolts have been modified, the controlling contractor must inform the erector that the modification has been done in accordance with the requirements under §1926.755(b). Section 1926.755(b) has two requirements: (1) no repair, replacement or modification shall take place without the approval of the project structural engineer of record, and (2) the erector must be informed in writing that there has been a repair, replacement or modification.
 I got a response today for my Right To Know:

Mt. Lebanon School District ("the District") is in receipt of your Public Records Request form dated September 6, 2012, which requests, pursuant to the Right to Know Law ("RTKL"), all daily inspection reports from the project’s testing and inspection firm concerning site work for the high school construction project.

Please be advised that the District requires additional time beyond five business days to respond to your request pursuant to Section 902 of the RTKL.

An extension of time is required because the extent and/or nature of the request preclude a response within the required time period.

The District expects to provide a written response to your request and have any responsive public records available within thirty (30) days of today's date, the records are available at an earlierdate.

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

New Voter ID Law UPDATED

While I am experiencing a high volume of hits today, I would like to take this opportunity to share the following Voter ID information.

From the Municipal website:
Voters will be required to present IDs in order to cast ballots in the November election. Your ID will be accepted it if "substantially conforms" to your voter registration. For a short summary of what sorts of IDs are acceptable and what to do if you don't have a proper ID, visit www.VotesPA.com and click on the red Voter ID link for information. To read a comprehensive guide to the new law go to http://www.alleghenycounty.us/elect/PhotoID/GeneralFAQ.pdf. Copies of the short version are available at the customer service center in the municipal building. If you do not qualify for a PennDOT driver's license or ID., you can get the new Department of State Voter ID card from PennDOT at a drivers license center. For further info about how to apply for the new ID and to locate the driver's license center nearest to you, visit www.dmv.state.pa.us or call 1-800-932-4600.
If you have already registered or are not sure whether you are registered here, you can confirm your registration status.

September 13, 2012 9:00 PM On the morning of Saturday, September 22, our commissioners will have printed information regarding how to obtain a voter ID for those who might need one, so that everyone can vote in the November elections. Look for them at the following places: Dave Brumfield, post office/ Galleria; Matt Kluck, golf course; Kristen Linfante, library; John Bendel, Beverly Road, and Kelly Fraasch, Uptown at the municipal building/Rolliers.

Daniel H. Pink's views on charter schools and homeschooling

According to Daniel H. Pink, charter schools and homeschooling are shaking up "big schoolhouse." In his article, "I'm a Saboteur" Pink writes:

The new economy is awash in contradictions, but few are more troubling than this one: At the very moment that brainpower is more important than ever, education seems more backward than ever. We have a new economy but outdated schools.
Out of this disconnect has emerged a quiet grassroots rebellion aimed at reinventing both the form and the function of American education. Charter schools – publicly funded startup schools that operate mostly free of regulation – have boomed. In 1992, there was one charter school in the United States. Today, there are more than 2,000. The fastest-growing education movement is homeschooling. Today, roughly 1.5 million children learn at home. Just as Internet startups and free agents rattled big business, charter schools and homeschooling are shaking up "big schoolhouse."

I bet we have some school board directors fainting over this one. I wonder when the office memo requesting the removal of all Daniel H. Pink Post It notes will be issued.

About making AYP for students with disabilities UPDATED 2x

During Monday's School Board meeting, Dr. Ron Davis and Dr. Deb Allen made a presentation concerning Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). See Tuesday's blog post, Some Children Left Behind. Since then, I received two articles that the School District should read. One is called Students With Disabilities Can Make AYP. This 117 page booklet is subtitled, "What Every School Leader Should Know."

The other article is titled, Promoting AYP for Students with Disabilities through Planning, Resources and Support. Both articles should be on the Superintendent Timothy Steinhauer's reading list since Mt. Lebanon School District has been issued a warning. In fact, it should be required reading for the assistant superintendents, as well as the school board president who feel that the legislation is ridiculous.

Update September 12, 2012 11:06 PM In today's Almanac, Avalanche of testing looms for Mt. Lebo students (saved in Google Docs)

"I think this is one of the more ridiculous pieces of legislation districts in the Commonwealth must abide by," said board president Jo Posti. "I would challenge legislators to find a district that serves these subgroups better than Mt. Lebanon."

She added that she had spoken with state Rep. Matt Smith (D-Mt. Lebanon) regarding the issue on several occasions, and urged concerned community members to contact elected officials as well.
Contact elected officials, as in elected school board officials, Josephine? Did the School District appeal? Or did they miss the deadline? Does MTLSD ever take responsibility or is it always someone else's fault in Harrisburg?

Update September 13, 2012 12:27 PM Today's PG has a great article written by Molly Born with Mary Niederberger. PSSA results come up short in Mt. Lebanon, Bethel Park
Two school districts in the southern suburbs are pointing to positives after disappointing state test score results: Mt. Lebanon for its high school, which failed to make adequate yearly progress, and Bethel Park for the district as a whole, which missed the mark on graduation rates and high school math scores.

School Board is apparently filing criminal charges against me

I found out that the school board is filing charges against me. I had approved an anonymous comment about the Joint Maintenance Agreement yesterday. The copy of the JMA that Steve Feller has is not a fully executed document. Unfortunately, I only skimmed the comments yesterday and didn't catch that the commenter suggested that those four commissioners who approved the JMA and the SB should be executed. Tonight (technically it was yesterday) after the Commission meeting, I was outside the municipal building talking with Kelly Fraasch. She mentioned that my blog was brought up today. She told me about the post which I totally missed. Dave Brumfield was outside also and Kelly asked him which thread had the comment. The three of us looked through my published comments and found the comment. I was shocked and immediately deleted it in front of them. It was a crazy day and I didn't read every comment carefully before approving them. When I got home from the meeting, there was a very important voice mail where I was told that Mt. Lebanon School District is filing criminal charges against me. The police are investigating. Also, the police were inquiring as to whether the commissioners would want to join in on the complaint.  Fortunately, I deleted the comment in front of two of the commissioners.


Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Construction update

"The project continues to move forward on schedule and on budget despite issues such as the electrical line hit that happened a couple of weeks ago." Josephine Posti, Center Court 8/30/12

"A time extension was granted."
Construction Update, 9/11/12

One of many lies.

Full disclosure.  I am not in building construction. I am just writing about what I learned from the 9/10/12 Construction Update. First, P.J. Dick representative, Mr. Berkebile, explained that 5 columns sank one inch. Dr. Steinhauer corrected him to say that the columns did not sink but the bolt connections sank.  Berkebile agreed. He mentioned that CEC inspected the bolt connections and welds.  Berkebile said that the base plates should have been shimmed but were not. Now the building is out of plumb. They are checking with the wood floor manufacturer to make sure that the warranty is intact. What? It is going to be out of plumb? So if you roll a basketball, it will roll towards the part that was not shimmed? SO THERE WAS SOMETHING SINKING!!! Posti, how dare you mock your constituents! How arrogant of you to blog about rumors! You really need to go.

Some Children Left Behind

According to Dr. Davis' report last night, MTLSD has been given a warning. Under the federal No Child Left Behind Act, which is bipartisan, students with special needs are not meeting their targets. Josephine Posti, Ron Davis, and Tim Steinhauer feel that this legislation is ridiculous. We must have 100% success and that sounds difficult to achieve, they say. Here is part of the presentation made last night. AYP Presentation AYP stands for Adequate Yearly Progress. It turns out that there is an appeal process available, with the deadline being August 7, 2012. 2012 Appeals Process Looks like they missed that. For more information on the AYP, check out the PA Department of Education website.

Monday, September 10, 2012

Breaking News: Hartwood Acres holiday lights canceled

Financial concerns have canceled this year's Annual Celebration of Lights at Hartwood Acres. Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald made the announcement this afternoon. He said in a statement that the holiday tradition, which started in 1991, was just too expensive.

It is rumored that the County heard about Jan Klein's 6.9% raise and is trying to help cut back. I heard someone mumbling something about Mt. Lebanon's 20 administrators receiving raises. But that is just a rumor I heard.

Who's to blame?



Remember the "rumor" that Josephine Posti addressed on her Center Court blog? http://jposti.blogspot.com/#!/2012/08/project-on-schedule-and-on-budget.html There has been speculation in the community since discussions first began with the change order for Geofoam. 

So tonight, there will be a discussion about the seven change orders listed on the agenda.  For some reason, the School District is only counting five towards the construction.

We now have a need for retaining walls, Geofoam, pyrite remediation, repairs to utility line conflicts, to name just a few of the change orders needed.

Back in October 2005, architects Burt Hill Kosar Rittelman Associates alerted school board directors of the unstable soil on the site. Mt. Lebanon Pool cost up again; now $6.5 million Knowing this, would Celli Flynn design a building on unstable soil? Is it poor workmanship? Nello built our Public Safety Building. Ask our police and firemen about the condition of the building. Or is it the school board directors? Remember this cost savings worksheet? Potential Project Cost Savings Worksheet Look at what was eliminated. Does the Board have the luxury to cherry pick from a list as to what should be eliminated? Doesn't one change affect others?

Didn't the Board waive contractors' insurance as a cost reduction? If that is the case, then there is no hope for reimbursement from insurance.

Friday, September 7, 2012

More change orders!

Monday's School Board Discussion Meeting Agenda has seven change orders listed, but the District is counting five.

Change Orders for High School Project – This month’s list reflects five change orders for the regular construction work.

a. Change order #GC-03-03 is to Nello Construction for repair of Morgan Drive as required by the Municipality totals $63,148
b. Change order #GC-04-04 is to Nello Construction for $30,093 for repair of utility line conflicts where the existing utility lines were mis-located on the site drawings.

c. Change order #EL-01-05 is to Farfield Electric Co. for $58,741for changes to the new electrical feed from Lebanon Ave. due to Duquesne Light’s redesign after the bids were approved.

d. Change order #EL-02-06 is to Farfield Electric Co. for a net credit of $6,279 for value engineering related to changes in electrical lines.

e. Change order #PL-01-07 is a net change to Vrable Plumbing for $17,195 for relocation of existing water lines and a change of some copper piping to PVC plastic.

f. Change order GC-05-08 is to Nello Construction for $11,431 for changes to retaining wall and pyrite remediation.

g. Change order #IN-01-01 is to Farfield Electric Co. for $272,497 for costs to date related to repairs necessitated by a damaged high voltage line off Cochran Rd. This is the first change order to repair the damaged electrical line and remediate the interior cleanup. We anticipate that there will be other change orders associated with this repaired electrical line.

What is pyrite remediation? Pyrite is a mineral also known as "Fool's Gold." When buried and undisturbed, it is benign. But when it is unearthed and exposed to air or water, it expands and reacts with the oxygen and water to form sulphuric acid. This expansion causes cracks in walls and foundations. Penn Hills has dealt with this issue during the construction of their new high school. Pyrite remediation to add to cost of new Penn Hill High School  Is this the basis of the rumors circulating in Mt. Lebanon? Retaining walls? Why didn't you write about this, Josephine? "Denial" is a more than just a river in Egypt.

Looks like the taxpayers are getting hit with the repair to the damaged electrical line. Surprise, surprise.

Thursday, September 6, 2012

Since you asked, Josephine UPDATED

Josephine Posti asked if we heard any good rumors in her August 30 post, Project On Schedule and On Budget. She writes:
Have you heard any good rumors?  Do you have questions or concerns?  Just ask.  At our last Board meeting we spent considerable time answering questions raised by one of our closest residents.  It was a great opportunity to not only address his individual concerns but to get out accurate information about security, utility outages, the project's schedule and how damage from the line hit will be addressed.  
If we have questions or concerns, you instructed us to ask. So we did. A Right To Know was filed on August 30, 2012. It would have been nice to have this RTK granted in time for Monday's Construction Update, but unfortunately, here is your response. Weekly construction meeting minutes This was a great opportunity to get out accurate information and you blew it. The email was CC'ed to: TSteinhauer@mtlsd.net; grobb@tuckerlaw.com; TPeterson@tuckerlaw.com I question why all RTK's are cc'ed to two attorneys at Tucker Arensberg.  Do the frivolous ones go to two attorneys?

Update September 6, 2012 6:22 PM An identical RTK was filed April 13, 2012 and was granted five business days later. Construction meeting minutes RTK 041312 What has changed? Could it have something to do with the rumors circulating?

Board President's Effort to Reinsert Coffees Into Platform

According to Josephine Posti's Center Court blog, Community Coffees, there are three opportunities to meet with school board directors.  Here is the schedule:

September 18
7-8:30 pm
Coffee Tree

October 3
7-8:30 am
Uptown Coffee

October 4
7-8:30 pm
Orbis Caffe

This round of coffees is a little different.  This year, in order to handle the crowds of residents flocking to speak with the SB, there will be four directors at each meeting, instead of three. There is no indication as to which directors will be present. Last year's coffee with Josephine attracted two residents. Their concerns were the Grievance, the Feasibility Study, and cuts to staff.

Take advantage of this opportunity to share the latest rumors, discover Steinhauer's sentence, discuss student parking, ask about Pursuant Ketchum, and to show your thanks for the YSA's generosity. You may get an answer besides, "File a Right To Know."

Monday, September 3, 2012

What is his sentence?

If you go on Tim Steinhauer's blog, you will see a Post-It note with two questions.


For an explanation to this thought provoking post, watch this short video by Daniel H. Pink.
http://vimeo.com/8480171
Dr. Tim's post is timely. It is the start of the new school year. I checked to see if Dr. Steinhauer's new goals have been posted.  They have not.  Here are his goals for last year:

Superintendent Performance Goals 2011-2012


1. Reorganization – The Superintendent will implement the revised administrative organizational structure.
2. Strategic Plan – The Superintendent will direct and supervise the completion of the District’s Strategic plan.
3. Student Success and Achievement – The Superintendent will implement measures to improve student achievement.
4. High School Project – The Superintendent will move forward the District’s efforts to build/renovate the High School.
5. Fiscal Responsibility – The Superintendent will operate the District in a fiscally responsible manner and identify and implement cost saving strategies.
6. Future of Education – The Superintendent will explore, identify, and implement innovative and effective educational programs.
7. Connection to the Community – The Superintendent will be a visible participant in school, community, and regional activities and events.

So what is Tim's sentence? Would it be:
  • Dr. Steinhauer was able to eliminate the supervisors and promote them to Dean of Students or principals, and give them raises even though his goal was "implementing the revised administrative organizational structure."
  • Dr. Steinhauer was known for getting raises while other superintendents accepted pay freezes.
  • Dr. Steinhauer never met all of his goals.
  • Dr. Steinhauer lied while under oath during the zoning hearing.
  • Dr. Steinhauer was to "operate the District in a fiscally responsible manner and identify and implement cost saving strategies." That translates to Dr. Steinhauer cut programs, reduced staff, and gave twenty administrators raises.
  • Dr. Steinhauer convinced the Policy Committee to give him more purchasing power.
This is the time of year when the Board reviews the Superintendent's goals, evaluates his performance, discusses if he is worthy of a raise, and determines his goals for the new school year. Was Tim better today than yesterday? Does it really matter?


Saturday, September 1, 2012

The Parking Chair

Josephine Posti reports on her blog that "Students have been observing parking and walking restrictions." We did have a recommendation made by a Lebo Citizens blog reader for residents on Main Entrance.  They should resort to using "The Parking Chair." This would eliminate any "issues" concerning parking on side streets.


Photo by Jennifer Ciroli
I am not sure that is necessary [or legal], particularly since Jo Posti's relatives on Main Entrance said that everything was good in the 'hood when this all started.

While I was looking up some school policies, I stumbled upon this policy, Policy ECE TRAFFIC AND PARKING REGULATIONS. I advise parents to read this, especially those who use Hoover for football practice.
The speed limit for all vehicles on all school property, including parking lots, streets, roadways and play areas, is 15 miles per hour. No vehicles (other than District authorized vehicles) are permitted on tracks, ball fields, lawns or District property other than roadways and parking areas.

Just last week, a car was parked on the field. The person who observed this found it ironic since the sports groups complain about the condition of our fields.

Another point of interest is:
Student vehicles parked on District property are subject to search by the District and/or law enforcement authorities at any time for any reason, with or without notice. General and random searches (including canine sniff searches) are authorized. Students should have no expectation of privacy as to vehicles on District property. Parking is a privilege, not a right, and student parking permits will be issued only where students and/or parents consent to such searches. Refusal to cooperate in such searches may result in loss of parking privileges as well as disciplinary action.

This raises some questions in my mind. Are student vehicles subject to search by the District and/or law enforcement authorities at the Mt. Lebanon Lutheran Church or municipal parking, such as Dixon? Now that the students have to pay for parking, is it still a privilege? We still are not sure about the District's right to enforce anything on municipal parking lots, are we? Are they allowed to charge for student parking on municipal lots?

I recommend that the Policy Committee review Policy ECE after they cook the books, I mean, review the policies concerning "Purchasing Authority" and "Construction Contracts, Bidding and Awards."

Joe Wertheim Memorial Fund


Remembering our wonderful friend,

Joe Wertheim,

Friends of Mt. Lebanon Public Library President and Library Board of Trustees Member.

1950-2012



Note: In observance of Labor Day, the library will be closed on Sunday, Sept. 2 & Monday, Sept. 3.